Abstract:Background: Prophylactic dressings are increasingly used to prevent pressure injuries in hospitalised patients. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of these dressings is still emerging. This trial aims to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a prophylactic silicone foam border dressing in preventing sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. Methods: This is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. A sample size of 1320 was calculated to have >90% power to detect a 5% difference in the primary outcome at an alpha of 0.05. Adult patients admitted to participating medical-surgical wards are screened for eligibility: ≥18 years, admitted to hospital within the previous 36 h, expected length of stay of ≥24 h, and assessed high risk for hospital-acquired pressure injury. Consenting participants are randomly allocated to either prophylactic silicone foam dressing intervention or usual care without any dressing as the control group via a web-based randomisation service independent of the trial. Patients are enrolled across three Australian hospitals. The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of patients who develop a sacral pressure injury. Secondary outcomes include the time to sacral pressure injury, incidence of severity (stage) of sacral pressure injury, cost-effectiveness of dressings, and process evaluation. Participant outcomes are assessed daily for up to 14 days by blinded independent outcome assessors using de-identified, digitally modified sacral photographs. Those who develop a sacral pressure injury are followed for an additional 14 days to estimate costs of pressure injury treatment. Analysis of clinical outcomes will be based on intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and sensitivity analyses. Discussion: This trial aims to provide definitive evidence on the effect prophylactic dressings have on the development of hospital-acquired sacral pressure injuries in medical-surgical patients. A parallel economic evaluation of pressure injury prevention and treatment will enable evidence-informed decisions and policy. The inclusion of a process evaluation will help to explain the contextual factors that may have a bearing on trial results including the acceptability of the dressings to patients and staff. The trial commenced 5 March 2020 and has been significantly delayed due to COVID-19. Trial registration: ANZCTR ACTRN12619000763145. Prospectively registered on 22 May 2019.

Oft Silicone Foam Dressing(Absorption of Mepilex) in the Treatment of Pressure Sores of Evidence-based Drug Economics

Meta analysis of effect of foam dressing and hydrocolloid dressing on bedsore management

Economic Evaluation of Multilayer Silicone-Adhesive Polyurethane Foam Dressing for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in At-Risk Hospitalized Patients: US and Italian Perspective

Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings to prevent hospital-acquired sacrum pressure ulcers: An economic evaluation based on a publicly funded pragmatic randomized controlled trial linked with real-world data

Clinical performance and cost‐effectiveness of a Silicone foam with 3DFitTM technology in chronic wounds compared with standard of care: An open randomised multicentre investigation

Systematic review and quality assessment of clinical and economic evidence for superabsorbent wound dressings in a population with chronic ulcers

Evaluation of effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressing vs ceramide containing dressing against pressure ulcers

Superabsorbent Wound Dressing for Management of Patients With Moderate-to-Highly Exuding Chronic Leg Ulcers: An Early Stage Model-Based Benefit–Harm Assessment

Evidence for Polymeric Membrane Dressings as a Unique Dressing Subcategory, Using Pressure Ulcers as an Example

The efficacy of sacral foam dressing in preventing sacral pressure injury: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

An Open, Parallel, Randomized, Comparative, Multicenter Investigation Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of Mepilex Ag Versus Silver Sulfadiazine in the Treatment of Deep Partial-Thickness Burn Injuries.

Clinical Effectiveness of a Silicone Foam Dressing for the Prevention of Heel Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients: Border II Trial.

A multilayer polyurethane foam dressing for pressure ulcer prevention in older hip fracture patients: an economic evaluation

Performance of a silicone foam dressing in management of wounds in a community setting: a sub-analysis of the VIPES study

Moist dressings in the treatment of pressure injuries: A network meta-analysis

Comparison of Healing Effect and Cost-effect Between Different Dressings in Wound Care

A Markov cost-effectiveness modeling framework for evaluating wound dressings: A concept for practical implementation of economic evaluations in an informed dressing selection process

Effect of Mepilex Lite Dressing on Radiation-induced Moist Desquamation in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma:Report of A New Soft Silicone Dressing

The frictional energy absorber effectiveness and its impact on the pressure ulcer prevention performance of multilayer dressings

Effect of prophylactic dressings to reduce pressure injuries: a polymer-based skin model

EffEctiveness of Prophylactic fOam dressings in the prevention of saCral pressure injuries in at-risk hospitalised patients: the EEPOC trial