Abstract:Objective: To assess the compliance with a lung protective ventilation strategy and to evaluate the relationship with prognosis in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: In the prospective multicenter cohort study (CHARDS), patients with ARDS undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation were enrolled to collect essential information, mechanical ventilation data, and prognostic data. Compliance was operationally defined as tidal volume ≤7 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) or plateau pressure ≤30 cmH2O or driving pressure≤15 cmH2O. Tidal volume data collected 7 days prior to ventilation after ARDS diagnosis were categorized into four groups: standard group (Group A, 100% compliance), non-standard group (Group B, 50%-99% compliance, Group C,1%-49% compliance,and Group D,totally non-compliant). Plateau pressure and drive pressure measurements were recorded on the first day. Stepwise regression, specifically Logistics regression, was used to identify the factors influencing ICU survival. Results: A total of 449 ARDS patients with invasive mechanical ventilation were included; the proportion of mild, moderate, and severe patients was 71 (15.8%), 198 (44.1%) and 180 (40.1%), respectively. During the first 7 days, a total of 2880 tidal volume measurements were recorded with an average tidal volume of (6.89±1.93) ml/kg PBW. Of these measurements, 53.2% were found to be≤7 ml/kg PBW. The rates of compliance with lung protective mechanical ventilation were 29.8% (134/449), 24.5% (110/449), 23.6% (106/449), and 22% (99/449) in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. In the standard group, the tidal volume for mild ARDS patients was 18.3%(13/71), while it was 81.7%(58/71)in the non-standard group. Similarly, in patients with moderate ARDS, the tidal volume was 25.8% (51/198) in the standard group, while it was 74.2% (147/198) in the non-standard group. Finally, in patients with severe ARDS, the tidal volume was 38.9% (70/180) in the standard group, while it was 61.1% (110/180) in the non-standard group. Notably, the compliance rate was higher in patients with moderate and severe ARDS in group A compared to patients with mild and moderate ARDS (18.3% vs. 25.8% vs. 38.9%, χ2=13.124, P=0.001). Plateau pressure was recorded in 221 patients, 95.9% (212/221) patients with plateau pressure≤30 cmH2O, and driving pressure was recorded in 207 patients, 77.8% (161/207) patients with a driving pressure ≤15 cmH2O.During the first 7 days, the mortality rate in the intensive care unit (ICU) was lower in the tidal volume standard group compared to the non-standard group (34.6% vs. 51.3%, χ2=10.464, P=0.001). In addition, the in-hospital mortality rate was lower in the standard group compared to the non-standard group (39.8% vs. 57%, χ2=11.016, P=0.001).The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the mortality rates of moderate and severe ARDS patients in the standard group were significantly lower than those in the non-standard group, both in the ICU and in the hospital (all P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality among mild ARDS patients (all P>0.05). Conclusions: There was high compliance with recommended lung protective mechanical ventilation strategies in ARDS patients, with slightly lower compliance in patients with mild ARDS, and high compliance rates for plateau and drive pressures. The tidal volume full compliance group had a lower mortality than the non-compliance group, and showed a similar trend in the moderate-to-severe ARDS subgroup, but there was no significant correlation between compliance and prognosis in patients with mild ARDS subgroup.

Advances in Clinical Stratergies of Lung Protective Ventilation

Effect of Individualized Protective Pulmonary Ventilation Strategy on Pulmonary Ventilation in Elderly Patients under General Anesthesia

The use of Dual control modes of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

[Lung protective strategies of ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome of neonates].

Lung-protective Ventilation in Patients with Brain Injury

The progress of mechanical ventilation strategy for acute respiratory distress syndrome

Application Progress of Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

[The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation combined with low tidal volume on prognosis of patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a Meta-analysis].

Lung Protective Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: a Systematic Review Incorporating a Bayesian Approach

The Application of Individualized Ventilation Strategies in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Individualized Mechanical Power-Based Ventilation Strategy for Acute Respiratory Failure Formalized by Finite Mixture Modeling and Dynamic Treatment Regimen

STUDY ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF LUNG PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON PATIENTS WITH ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME BY MEANS OF ADAPTIVE SUPPORT VENTILATION

Early pathophysiology-driven airway pressure release ventilation versus low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with moderate-severe ARDS: study protocol for a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial

Evidence-Based Mechanical Ventilatory Strategies in ARDS

Ventilator-associated lung injury

Mechanism of lung protective ventilation improving prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Ventilator for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ventilator for the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Ventilator-associated lung injury: a search for better therapeutic targets

Personalized ventilation adjustment in ARDS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of image, driving pressure, transpulmonary pressure, and mechanical power

[Analysis of compliance with lung protective mechanical ventilation strategy in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome]