Piroxicam Patch in Treatment of Acute and Chronic Pain: a Multicenter, Randomized and Controlled Clinical Study

WANG Zhi-yi,DAI Min,SHI Yu-xiang,ZHENG Shu-hui,PENG A-qin,ZHANG Ke-liang,WANG Ji-bo,ZHANG Li-dan,ZHOU Yi-xiong,ZHANG Wei-bin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7669.2006.11.010
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of piroxicam patch in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. METHODS: A randomized, single blind, positive-control, and multicenter clinical trail was conducted. The patients with acute or chronic pain were radomized divided into two groups. The patients in the trial group were treated with piroxicam patch once every other day, while the other patients in the control group with diclofenac emulsion three times per day, with 14 d for each group. The main indexes of efficacy were visual analougue scale (VAS) score of the pain at rest and in activity of the target region. The secondary indexes included general evaluation of therapeutic effect, total comment by patients, initial effective time, pain disappearing time, score changes of tumefaction, and tenderness. Safety was also under monitoring. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients with acute or chronic pain were enrolled in the study, including 106 patients completed the study in the trial (piroxicam) group and 104 patients in the control (diclofenac) group. Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the baseline data, classification, and degree of pain, etc. After treatment, according to full analysis set (FAS), the VAS scores at rest in control and trail groups reduced 2.6±s 2.0 vs 3.6±2.3 with the improve rates (50±47) % vs (63±38) % (P 0.01), respectively. While the VAS scores in activity reduced 3.0±2.3 vs 4.0±2.4, with the improve rates (44±33) % vs (61±32) % (P 0.01), respectively. General evaluations of therapeutic effect were 70.2 % vs 82.1 % (P 0.05) and total comments by patients were 81.4 % vs 93.3 % in control and trail groups. Trial group showed better results than those of the control group in the initial effective time, score changes of tumefaction, and tenderness (P 0.05) . The pain disappearing times were similar in two groups (P 0.05). The incidences of adverse drug reaction have no significant difference between the two groups. The results of per protocol (PP) analysis were similar to those of FAS analysis. CONCLUSION: Piroxicam patch shows better efficacy and similar safety in the treatment of acute and chronic pain in comparing with diclofenac.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?