Abstract:Aggressive or violent behaviour is often associated with people with schizophrenia in common perceptions of the disease. Risk assessment methods have been used to identify and evaluate the behaviour of those individuals who are at the greatest risk of perpetrating aggression or violence or characterise the likelihood to commit acts. Although many different interventions have been developed to decrease aggressive or violent incidences in inpatient care, staff working in inpatient settings seek easy‐to‐use methods to decrease patient aggressive events. However, many of these are time‐consuming, and they require intensive training for staff and patient monitoring. It has also been recognised in clinical practice that if staff monitor patients' behaviour in a structured manner, the monitoring itself may result in a reduction of aggressive/violent behaviour and incidents in psychiatric settings. To assess the effects of structured aggression or violence risk assessment methods for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia‐like illnesses. We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study‐Based Register of Trials, which is based on CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, on 10 February 2021. We also inspected references of all identified studies. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing structured risk assessment methods added to standard professional care with standard professional care for the evaluation of aggressive or violent behaviour among people with schizophrenia. At least two review authors independently inspected citations, selected studies, extracted data, and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes, we calculated a standard estimation of the risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference (MD) and its 95% CI. We assessed risk of bias in the included studies and created a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. We included four studies in the review. The total number of participants was not identifiable, as some studies provided number of participants included, and some only patient days. The studies compared a package of structured assessment methods with a control group that included routine nursing care and drug therapy or unstructured psychiatric observations/treatment based on clinical judgement. In two studies, information about treatment in control care was not available. One study reported results for our primary outcome, clinically important change in aggressive/violent behaviour, measured by the rate of severe aggression events. There was likely a positive effect favouring structured risk assessment over standard professional care (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.85; 1 RCT; 1852 participants; corrected for cluster design: RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93; moderate‐certainty evidence). One trial reported data for the use of coercive measures (seclusion room). Compared to standard professional care, structured risk assessment may have little or no effect on use of seclusion room as days (corrected for cluster design: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.07; N = 20; low‐certainty evidence) or use of seclusion room as secluded participants (RR 1.83, 95% CI 0.39 to 8.7; 1 RCT; N = 20; low‐certainty evidence). However, seclusion room may be used less frequently in the standard professional care group compared to the structured risk assessment group (incidence) (corrected for cluster design: RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.49 to 5.47; 1 RCT; N = 20; substantial heterogeneity, Chi 2 = 0.0; df = 0.0; P = 0.0; I 2 = 100%; low‐certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a clear effect on adverse events of escape (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.11; 1 RCT; n = 200; very low‐certainty evidence); fall down (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.15; 1 RCT; n = 200; very low‐certainty evidence); or choking (RR 0.2, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.11; 1 RCT; n = 200; very low‐certainty evidence) when comparing structured risk assessment to standard professional care. There were no useable data for patient‐related outcomes such as global state, acceptance of treatment, satisfaction with treatment, quality of life, service use, or costs. Based on the available evidence, it is not possible to conclude that structured aggression or violence risk assessment methods are effective for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia‐like illnesses. Future work should combine the use of interventions and structured risk assessment methods to prevent aggressive incidents in psychiatric inpatient settings. Review question Are structured aggression or violence risk assessment methods effective for people with schizophrenia or schizophrenia‐like illnesses for decreasing aggressive incidents in psychiatric settings? Background Aggressive or violent behaviour is often associated with people with schizophrenia in common perceptions -Abstract Truncated-

Investigation and Analysis of Risk Factors of Schizophrenia Patients in Open Wards

Evaluation of suicide risk factors in psychiatric opening wards

Suicide Risk in Major Affective Disorder: Results from a National Survey in China.

Risk factor analysis of suicide attempts in bipolar disorder patients with psychotic symptoms

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Agitation in Newly Hospitalized Schizophrenia Patients in China: an Observational Survey

Risk factors for violent behaviors in patients with schizophrenia: 2-year follow-up study in primary mental health care in China

Correlates of agitation in newly hospitalized patients with schizophrenia

An Exploration of Depression and Aggression Among Patients with Schizophrenia in China Rural Community

Investigation and intervention Strategy of Mental health status of college nursing student during clinical internship

Investigation on the cognition and behavior of clinical nurses about hospital violence events in a 3A-level hospital

[Survey of Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts in Outpatients at 50 General Hospitals in Beijing].

Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Model for Aggressive Behaviors of Community Patients with Schizophrenia

Treatment traits of acute schizophrenic inpatients with aggressive behaviors before admission

[Association Between Medication Compliance and Various Risky Behaviors in Patients With Schizophrenia]

Aggressive behavior and its associated factors among persons with mental illness: An observational study

Influencing Factors of Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts among Community Residents in Beijing

Candidate symptomatic markers for predicting violence in schizophrenia: A cross-sectional study of 7711 patients in a Chinese population

Research on interpersonal violence in schizophrenia: based on different victim types

Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia

Correlation between agitation and preadmission aggressive behaviors in the acute inpatients with schizophrenia

Risk Factors of Alcohol Use Disorders Among Inpatients with Schizophrenia: An Institutional-Based Cross-sectional Survey