Abstract:Rural-to-urban migration in China since the 1970srepresents the largest labour flow ever observed in the world.Despite the proliferation of research seeking to understand its mechanisms and magnitude,little is done to identify the direct causal effects of migrant networks on labour market outcomes at the destination.In addition,some previous studies show that family and social networks do not influence the wages of the rural-to urban migrants.However,this finding may be problematic because the concept of networks has not been correctly defined.Rural-to-urban migrants return home frequently within a year.As a result,villages of origin serve as an important intermediary where the migrant workers exchange information.This homecoming-and-go pattern implies the pivotal role of the village-level outflow of migrants in determining their job wages at the destination.Using data from 22provinces in China,this paper analyses the effect of village-based migrant networks on the wages of migrant labourers,with particular attention to the potential endogeneity problem.Heckman ' s two-stage method is used to correct for the sampling problem.Natural disaster in the village of origin is used as an instrumental variable(IV) to deal with other endogeneity biases.The major innovation of this study is taking the total outflow of migrants at the origins as the focus and having Heckman ' s two-stage method and the IV approach combined.After controlling for the unobserved factors influencing the migration decision,the model is achieved through instrumenting the outflow size of migrant workers by the endogenous effect of natural disasters.The empirical results show that the size of the migrant network significantly improves the wages of the migrants.The mechanism is straight forward:Village-based networks transmit job-related information in cities among migrants through which migrant workers can get more and better job opportunities.The IV estimate suggests that network effects obtained from conventional Heckit model are downwardly biased.This paper interprets it within the framework of heterogeneous network effects.That is,Heckit estimate applies to all villages /individuals while the IV estimate mainly applies to the sub-group of villages /individuals more affected by natural disasters.With the presence of heterogeneity effects,the IV estimate can be interpreted as a Local Average Treatment Effects(LATE).One possible mechanism is that less able people(in terms of earning ability at the destination) are more responsive to natural disasters,since they have a relatively lower ability to compensate for losses due to natural disasters.That is,villagers of lower earning ability are more likely to be " pushed " out from the villages by natural hazards.If this is the case,the IV estimate can be interpreted as a weighted average network effect and the weight for the less able migrants is relatively higher.Since less able migrants benefit more from origin-based networks,the IV estimate mainly captures the network effects among them and it would thenbe higher than the Heckit estimate.

The Levels of Social Network and Wage of Rural-urban Migrants: From a Perspective of Indentity Model

Social Network of Rural-urban Migrants and Their Occupation Stratum and Income——Findings from Survey in Shenzhen

Social network, intra-network education spillover effect and rural–urban migrants' wages: Evidence from China

Heterogeneous Social Network and Rural Migrant Worker’s Wage: Evidence from China

Social Capital and the Reproduction of Inequality：The Case of Income Differential between Rural Migrants and Urban Workers

Sociability and Wage Earnings of Rural Migrant Workers

The Impact Mechanism of Social Networks on Chinese Rural–urban Migrant Workers’ Behaviour and Wages

Does Social Capital Affect Farmer-migrants' Income?:An Analysis Based on Models of Estimation and Test of the Ordered Response

Village-Based Networks and Wages of Rural-to-Urban Migrants:Estimating the Causal Effects of Networks Using Combined Identification Strategies

Do Networks Pay Off Among Internal Migrants in China?: An Instrumental Variable Analysis

Employment Status,Social Security and the Willingness of Migration of the Rural Migrant Labors Between Cities

The Impact of Social Capital on Wages of Rural Migrants and Its Gender Difference in China

The Social Capital and Wage Income Differentials between Urban Workers and Rural Migrants: Based on Improved Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition

Sense of Belonging and Social Identity on the Settlement Intentions of Rural-Urban Migrants: Evidence from China

Social Network, Job-Seeking Methods and Wage Determination of New Generation Migrant Workers

Do Neighbourhoods Have Effects on Wages? A Study of Migrant Workers in Urban China

Network Spillover, Education Return and the Earnings of Rural Migrants in China: An Inter-generational Perspective

Evolution of the Chinese Rural-Urban Migrant Labor Market from 2002 to 2007

Settlement intention of migrants in urban China: The effects of labor-market performance, employment status, and social integration

Host Identity and Consumption Behavior: Evidence from Rural–Urban Migrants in China

Rural Migrants' Self-employment Decisions and Their Earnings