Abstract:The relationships of allometric growth between urban area and population should be reduced to urban density models of land-use and population distribution theoretically, and in turn it should be derived from urban density functions. The precondition of the transformation mentioned above is that both urban population and urban land use density follow the same scaling law: either negative exponential or inverse power function. However, the urban population density in real world complies with the Clark's law, namely the negative exponential function, while the urban land use density conforms to the inverse power function. The sticking point lies in that urban population is defined in 3-dimension space with land use in 2-dimension space. Spatial complexity appears while an object in 3-d is projected to 2-d. If population of cities are taken into account in only 2-d space, the space dimension is harmonized and maybe the logic contradiction can be eliminated. In this case, the issue of the dimension consistency must be considered,which can be formulated as a relation b=D/d. Where b is the scaling factor of the model allometric growth, D is the dimension of urban land use, and d the dimension of urban population. When the allometric model is reduced to the power function named Smeed's model, the exponent α must abide by the relation such as α=2-d, where d is dimension of city population. Now that d value comes between 1 and 2, α is supposed to be smaller than 1, namely α1. This is a very important criterion used to judge if urban population of a city conforms to Smeed's model: no matter when the exponent appears greater than 1, it implies that the city fails to comply with the power law. On the other hand, when the observed data follow power-law distribution with the exponent smaller than 1, the urban population can be regarded as self-similar and the fractal geometry can be employed to analyze the city system.

EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL COMPLEXITY OF URBAN SYSTEMS AND ITS STOMMEL DIAGRAM

Scaling laws and indications of self-organized criticality in urban systems

Zipf's Law, Hierarchical Structure, and Cards-Shuffling Model for Urban Development

Cities, Fractals and Spatial Complexity

Self-organizing Networks of Cities: Scaling Laws, Symmetry, Complexity and Optimization

Fractal-Based Exponential Distribution of Urban Density and Self-Affine Fractal Forms of Cities

The spatial complexity of the law of allometric growth and urban population density

Modeling fractal structure of city-size distributions using correlation function

Scaling, Fractals and the Spatial Complexity of Cities

Hierarchical Scaling in Systems of Natural Cities

Modeling fractal structure of city-size distributions using correlation functions

An analytical process of the spatio-temporal evolution of urban systems based on allometric and fractal ideas

Recursive Subdivision of Urban Space and Zipf's law

Recursive Subdivision of Urban Space and Zipf’s Law

Scaling Analysis of the Cascade Structure of the Hierarchy of Cities

Zipf's law, 1/f noise, and fractal hierarchy

Understanding the mesoscopic scaling patterns within cities

Modeling Fractal Structure of Systems of Cities Using Spatial Correlation Function

Measuring Global Urban Complexity from the Perspective of Living Structure

Analogies Between Urban Hierarchies and River Networks: Fractals, Symmetry, and Self-Organized Criticality

Fractal Analysis Based on Hierarchical Scaling in Complex Systems