Influence of closure techniques for the remnant on pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy

Gao Hong-qiao,ZHUANG Yan,WU Wen-han,WAN Yuan-lian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-3946.2009.01.011
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To determine appropriate methods for closure of the pancreatic remnant to prevent fistula(PF)formation after distal pancreatectomy(DP).Methods The perioperative and postoperative data of 186 patients who had undergone distal pancreatectomy between 1996 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively.The incidence of PF between patients with continous suture with prolene and patients with interrupted suture closure of pancreatic remnant,duct ligation,stump ligation,pancreaticoenteric anastomosis and stapler closure was compared.Results Overall,postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 2.7% and 34.9% respectively.Pancreatic fistula occurred in 21.0%(39/186).Of the six methods of remnant closure,pancreatic duct ligation and continous suture with prolene had the lowest rates of fistula formation for 13.9%(5/36)vs.15.6%(10/64).In contrast,stump ligation and interrupted suture closure showed a higher rate of 50%(4/8)and,32.0%(16/50)respectively.There is a significant difference compared to continous suture with prolene(P<0.05).No patients with chronic pancreatitis who underwent pancreaticoenteric anastomosis and using stapling device developed fistulae.Conclusions Stump ligation and interrupted suture closure of pancreatic remnant would increase the fistula formation rate after distal pancreatectomy.Pancreatic duct ligation and continous suture with prolene,especially the latter,are safe and simple.Pancreaticoenteric anastomosis should be used in patients with duct obstruction;stapler technique is only indicated for laparoscopic surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?