Study on preservation of laryngeal function and prognosis after different treatment modalities in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients

TIAN Wen-dong,ZENG Zong-yuan,CHEN Fu-jin,WU Guo-hao,GUO Zhu-ming,LI Hao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5269.2007.01.017
2007-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To review the experience for a consecutive cohort of 97 patients with previously untreated hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, to evaluate the survival, relapse and larynx preservation of several treatment modalities and to seek more reasonable therapeutic modality. METHODS: Outcome measures were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Pearsonχ2 test/Fisher’s exact test by SPSS 10.0 statistic software. Of theses patients, 30 patients had radiotherapy, 17 patients had neo-adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, 37 patients had surgery alone, 33 patients had surgery plus radiotherapy, and 6 patients had palliative chemotherapy. RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival rate of the 97 patients was 46.43%,the 5-year overall survival was 31.88%, and the median survival time was 28 months. The 5-year survival was 18.33% for the radiotherapy alone group, 23.53% for the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, 36.36% for the surgery alone group, and 53.65% for the surgery plus radiotherapy group, respectively. In the 41 patients with surgery, the 5-year survival of patients with laryngeal function preserved and no laryngeal function preserved were 57.44% and 39.16% respectively, P=0.357 4 and the 5-year local relapse rate of the two groups were 21.05% and 13.64%, P=0.414 0. There was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The life expectancy for patients with these tumors is very poor. Results of the radiotherapy alone or chemo-radiotherapy, in these tumors, are disappointing and the surgery also cannot obviously raise the survival rate. The survival rate of radical surgery with postoperative radiotherapy group is obviously higher than those of the other groups. The preservation of the normal part of the larynx in some patients is feasible and will not raise the risk of relapse.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?