Abstract:The transition metal 3d 3 ions activated in various host crystals have been studied in a great number of experiments and calculations. Their energy levels in strong crystal field namely 4 A 2 , 2 E, 2 T 1 , 2 T 2 , 4 T 2 , and 4 T 1a play important roles in the luminescence process. Especially, the transition energy from 2 E state to 4 A 2 state or R-line has been utilized for the emission process. Since the development of ligand field theory (LFT), the first-principles calculations have been helpful to understand the behavior of R-line. In 1982, Ohnishi and Sugano [1] carried out the semi-empirical first-principles calculation based on the discrete variational Xα (DV-Xα) method [2] to estimate the emission energy of ruby (Al 2 O 3 doped with Cr 3+ ) at various bond lengths under O h symmetry. In their estimation, the barycenter of t 2 g 3 configuration was an important parameter to estimate the R-line energy. Although the results are reasonable, the barycenter was defined as the average of only 3 multiplet states i.e. 2 E, 2 T 1 , and 2 T 2 states. However, according to LFT, the t 2 g 3 configuration consists of 4 multiplet states not only 2 E, 2 T 1 , and 2 T 2 states but also the ground state, 4 A 2 . Therefore, here we proposed a new calculation formula to improve the accuracy of R-line energy by considering 4 multiplet states such as 4 A 2 , 2 E, 2 T 1 , and 2 T 2 states. Two types of model clusters, non-optimized and optimized model clusters consisting of 63 atoms were used for the calculations. The impurity Cr 3+ ion was located at the center of the model clusters. The non-optimized model cluster was constructed based on the experimental crystal structures of α-Al 2 O 3 under pressures with hexagonal A 2 X 3 structure. On the other hand, since the local structure in the actual materials is different from the original ones, the optimized model cluster was constructed to consider the effect of lattice relaxation. It was estimated by performing geometry optimization using the CAmbridge Serial Total Energy package (CASTEP) code [3]. Firstly, the structural optimizations of pure α-Al 2 O 3 crystal under various pressures were carried out and then followed by the geometry optimization of α-Al 2 O 3 crystal doped with Cr 3+ ion. The molecular orbitals energies were then estimated by performing one-electron calculations using DV-Xα method for both model clusters. During the calculations, the local C 3 symmetry was maintained to minimize the computational error. Next, the R-line energies were then estimated by two different approaches i.e., (1) based on the approach proposed by Ohnishi’s group and (2) based on LFT. Figure 1 shows the theoretical R-line energies of ruby under pressures calculated using the optimized model clusters. E R 1 and E R 2 indicate the estimated R-line energies based on the approach proposed by Ohnishi’s group and those based on LFT, respectively. For comparison, the R-line energies of ruby at various Cr-O bond length calculated under O h symmetry [1] and the experimental R-line energies of ruby under pressures observed within C 3 symmetry [4] are shown together in Fig. 1. Our results show that by both approaches, the R-line energies decrease as the applied pressure increases. Accordingly, simple estimation based on one-electron calculations has successfully reproduced the tendency of ruby’s emission energies. Compare to the experimental values, the R-line energies estimated based on Ohnishi’s approach were significantly underestimated. On the other hand, the calculated R-line energies based on LFT improved the accuracy towards the experiment excellently. References [1]. S.Ohnishi and S.Sugano. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 21 (1982) L309-L331. [2]. H. Adachi, M. Tsukada, and C. Satoko. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 45 (1978) 875-883. [3]. M. C. Payne, M. P. Teter, D. C. Allan, T. A. Arias, and J. D. Joannopoulos. Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 1045-1097. [4]. J. H. Eggert, K. A. Goettel, and I. F. Silvera. Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) 5724-5732. Figure 1

Electronic-Structure of Alumina and Ruby

Electronic Structure of High-pressure Alumina Polymorphs

Structural relaxations around Ti, Cr and Fe impurities in alpha-Al2O3 probed by x-ray absorption near edge structure combined with first-principles calculations

Study of Raman Spectra for Γ-Al2o3 Models by Using First-Principles Method

Crystal structure of a high-pressure/high-temperature phase of alumina by in situ X-ray diffraction

Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the Structural and Electronic Properties of Aluminoborosilicate Glass

Optical spectrum and local lattice structure for ruby

First-Principles Calculation on the Emission Energy Level of Ruby Based on DV-Xα Molecular Orbital Method and Ligand Field Theory

First-principles calculation of ground and excited-state absorption spectra of ruby and alexandrite considering lattice relaxation

The electronic and optical properties of Al 2O 3, MO, and MAI 2O 4 (M = Zn, Mg)

Optical Transitions In Ruby Across The Corundum To Rh2o3 (Ii) Phase Transformation

Inference of principal species in caustic aluminate solutions through solid-state spectroscopic characterization

Optical Transitions in Ruby Across the Corundum Torh2o3(ii) Phase Transformation

Quantitative studies on the microstructure of ternary CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 glasses by Raman spectroscopy, 27Al MAS NMR and quantum chemistry ab initio calculation

Elasticity of Nonstoichiometric Alumina-Rich Spinel Determined by Bond Valence Theory and Brillouin Scattering

The crystal structure of Tl-β-alumina

Structural, Electronic, and Optical Properties of Nial3: First-Principles Calculations

X-ray diffraction of ruby (Al2O3:Cr3+) to 175 GPa

Exploring the Crystal Structure and Electronic Properties of γ-Al2O3: Machine Learning Drives Future Material Innovations

Infrared spectra in amorphous alumina: a combined ab initio and experimental study

First-principles Calculations of the Electronic Structure and Defects of Al2O3