Abstract:The push towards research commercialisation at universities has highlighted the importance of intellectual property (IP) policies in fostering innovation and guiding and managing research commercialisation activities. This paper undertakes a content analysis of intellectual property policies of all (37) Australian public universities, focusing on policy objectives, definition of IP, ownership of IP created by different creators, and distribution of net commercialisation revenues. It is found that all universities assert ownership over staff-created IP, particularly when related to employment or utilisation of university resources. For students, policies tend to balance their rights with university interests, with nuanced approaches for different types of student participation, but the focus of most policies was on postgraduate students engaging in research activities. While some policies had clear arrangements for IP created by visitors and affiliates and Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (ICIP), about a quarter of policies did not specify arrangements for these groups. Revenue sharing arrangements vary but generally award something between a third to a half of net revenue to creators, to both acknowledge their contribution and incentivise further innovation. Policies included a broad spectrum of objectives, from protecting and commercialising IP to fostering innovation and societal benefit, reflecting varying strategies across the higher education sector. Policies could benefit from further clarity in certain areas such as the rights of students or other creator groups. Research is needed to assess the effectiveness of these policies and their influence on innovation and commercialisation activities.

Institutions and Intellectual Property: the Influence of Institutional Forces on University Patenting

Empirical Study on Impact of Different Types of Patents on Technology Progress

Technology Transfer and the End of the Bayh-Dole Effect: Patents as an Analytical Lens on University-Industry-Government Relations

The Decline of University Patenting and the End of the Bayh–Dole Effect

Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and Its Related Researches

Behind the Recent Surge of Chinese Patenting: an Institutional View

Evaluation of economic incentives for Chinese university patent transfers: Is increasing the inventor share rate more effective?

The Dilemma of Universities Intellectual Property Policy and Its Overcomes

Knowledge Spillover of University and Innovation Performance of Large and Medium-sized Enterprises

Navigating intellectual property (IP): A comparative analysis of Australian universities' IP policies

The Globalization of Academic Entrepreneurship? The Recent Growth (2009-2014) in University Patenting Decomposed

University engagement in open innovation and intellectual property: evidence from university–industry collaborations

Patent output and patent transfer network in China universities: Moderating roles of absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity

The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university-industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data

Scientific and Technological Innovation and Cooperation in the Greater Bay Area of China: A Case Study of University Patent Applications and Transformation

The Analyses on Cooperative Patents Output under the Perspective of Collaborative Innovation of Central Ministry-affiliated Universities

The Impact of Regional Patent Policies on University Technology Transfer: Empirical Evidence from China

University-Industry Knowledge Transfer Policy and Its Effective Implementation Conditions——Based on Comparative Analysis on U.S., Japan, and China Versions of Bayh-Dole Act

Globalization And Growth Of Us University Patenting (2009-2014)

The Relation Between University Science Base and Follow-Up Patent Activity

Do funding sources matter?: The impact of university-industry collaboration funding sources on innovation performance of universities