Abstract:We explore the utility of future photometric redshift imaging surveys for delineating the large‐scale structure of the Universe, and assess the resulting constraints on the cosmological model. We perform the following two complementary types of analysis. (i) We quantify the statistical confidence and the accuracy with which such surveys will be able to detect and measure characteristic features in the clustering power spectrum such as the acoustic oscillations and the turnover, in a ‘model‐independent’ fashion. We show for example that a 10 000‐deg2 imaging survey with depth r= 22.5 and photometric redshift accuracy δz/(1 +z) = 0.03 will detect the acoustic oscillations with 99.9 per cent confidence, measuring the associated preferred cosmological scale with 2 per cent precision. Such a survey will also detect the turnover with 95 per cent confidence, determining the corresponding scale with 20 per cent accuracy. (ii) By assuming a Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model power spectrum we calculate the confidence with which a non‐zero baryon fraction can be deduced from such future galaxy surveys. We quantify ‘wiggle detection’ by calculating the number of standard deviations by which the baryon fraction is measured, after marginalizing over the shape parameter. This is typically a factor of 4 more significant (in terms of number of standard deviations) than the above ‘model‐independent’ result. For both analyses, we quantify the variation of the results with magnitude depth and photometric redshift precision, and discuss the prospects for obtaining the required performance with realistic future surveys. We conclude that the precision with which the clustering pattern may be inferred from future photometric redshift surveys will be competitive with contemporaneous spectroscopic redshift surveys, assuming that systematic effects can be controlled. We find that for equivalent wiggle detection power, a photometric redshift survey requires an area approximately 12[δz/(1 +z)]/0.03 times larger than a spectroscopic survey, for a given magnitude limit. We also note that an analysis of luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey may yield a marginal detection of acoustic oscillations in the imaging survey, in addition to that recently reported for the spectroscopic component.

Complementarity of Future Dark Energy Probes

Constraints on Dark Energy from New Observations Including Pan-STARRS

Constraining Cosmological Parameters with Observational Data Including Weak Lensing Effects

Probing dark energy using baryonic oscillations in the galaxy power spectrum as a cosmological ruler

The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using Lamost Redshift Survey

Constraining dark energy via baryon acoustic oscillations in the (an)isotropic light-cone power spectrum

Optimising Spectroscopic and Photometric Galaxy Surveys: Same-sky Benefits for Dark Energy and Modified Gravity

Constraints on Redshift-Binned Dark Energy using DESI BAO Data

The state of the dark energy equation of state circa 2023

Dynamical dark energy confronted with multiple CMB missions

Constrain Spatial Curvature and Dark Energy with Strong Lenses and Complementary Probes: a Forecast for Next-Generation Surveys

Prospects for measuring dark energy with 21 cm intensity mapping experiments: A joint survey strategy

Multiprobe Cosmology from the Abundance of SPT Clusters and DES Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

Cosmological constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024

Measuring Dark Energy with Gamma-Ray Bursts and Other Cosmological Probes

A path to precision cosmology: synergy between four promising late-universe cosmological probes

Dark Energy Constraints from Weak Lensing Cross-Correlation Cosmography

Probing dark energy with the next generation X-ray surveys of galaxy clusters

Features in the Dark Energy Equation of State and Modulations in the Hubble Diagram

Cosmology with photometric redshift surveys