Abstract:Apology is one of the forms of tortuous liabilities when a right of personality is infringed under Chinese law. Regarding whether this is a constitutional or reasonable rule in law, a heated argument is going on among Chinese scholars. This paper argues that, apology helps to redress a victim's emotional and psychological wounds, therefore serves the function to repair harm just as other forms of tortuous liabilities. If the defendant fails to make an appropriate apology voluntarily before the end of court debate, the court should order the defendant to apologize in the judgment. Although an apology under a judgment may be insincere, it is still valuable for many victims. Moreover, based on the theory of cognitive dissonance, the judgment may induce the defendant to adjust his attitude and lead to a sincere apology. The most difficult part of this question is the compulsory enforcement of apology. This paper examines the possible measures of enforcement provided in the civil procedure law. Indirect enforcement measures, mainly fine or imprisonment, are unconstitutional in light of the principle of proportionality for violation of the freedom of expression, freedom of religion and human dignity protected by Chinese constitution. Publication of the content of judgment is not an appropriate form of substitutional enforcement because it cannot reach a similar effect as apology. Another suggestion, that the plaintiff or the court drafts a letter of apology on behalf of the defendant and publishes it when the defendant refuses to do so, also flaws. This paper proposes a special form of subsitutional enforcement that the victim should be allowed to publish a declaration of reprimand and the defendant should be ordered to pay the cost, because a reprimand by the victim could redress his emotional and psychological wounds as well as a personal apology of the defendant. If the victim doesn't want to do so, a sum of money, the amount of which is determined in the judgment, should be paid by the defendant.

The Liability of the Spokesman in False Advertisement from the Perspective of Food Safety Law

Article 55 of Food Safety Law from the Perspective of Economic Law——Doubt on Rationality of Liability of the Spokesman in False Advertisement

On the Responsibility of Spokesmen for False Advertising——From the Perspective of No.55 of ＂Food Safety Law＂

The Nature of the Celebrity Endorsement Advertising and the Assumption of the Liability:Also a Comment on the Article 8 of the Tort Liability Law of China

Discussion on the Legal Liability Investigation Mechanisms for Food Safety Government Supervision

Joint and Several Liability of the Advertising Attestor in Judicial Practice:From the Angle of Reg.60 of the Draft of Advertising Regulations(Invitation for Comments)

On the Legal Basis for Stars' Endorsement on False Advertising Holding Responsible

A Comparative Study on Liability for Information Products: in Perspective of American Law

On the Civil Liabilities for False Statements in the Securities Market

Advertisements on Foods:Concept Generalization,Health Fantasy and Communication Ethics

The Abuse of Presumption and Its Causes in Press Defamation Lawsuits in China

Analysis of the Criminal Liability of the Payoff Journalism

Discrepancy of False Medical Advertisement Supervision Between China and the United States

A questionnaire survey of legal responsibility for fraudulent financial reporting

On Credibility of Chinese Enterprises from "Sanlu Milk Powder Incident"

Analysis for the Forming and Monitoring of Exaggerated Advertisement

Study on Advertisement Promulgator--Based on Positive Analysis About New Media Advertising

Constructing the accountability of food safety as a public problem in China: a document analysis of Chinese scholarship, 2008–2018

A Game Theory Analysis of the Supervision of Food Safety in the Background of "Sanlu Milk Powder Event"

The Liability of Apology in Civil Law and its Compulsory Enforcement

An Empirical Investigation into the Judicial Application of Article 96 of the Food Safety Law