Characteristics and its risk fastors of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography in the early brain development of preterm infant
Guoyu Sun,Xinlin Hou,Congle Zhou,Lili Liu,Zezhong Tang,Yi Jiang,Hongmei Wang,Yanxia Zhou,Huan Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2015.04.005
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To study the characteristics and its risk fastors of brain development of the preterm infant early after birth in amplitude-integrated electroencephalography(aEEG). Methods The 153 preterm infants who had seen a doctor in Peking University First Hospital from April 2009 to August 2013 accepted the aEEG check at term of corrected gestational age ( ≥ 38 weeks but < 42 weeks of corrected gestational age). The risk factors of brain development, such as gestational age ( < 30, 30 ≤ - ≤ 33+6 and 34≤-≤36+6 weeks), clinical informations [relatively stable group including 104 cases without any serious complications or brain injury, the group only suffering from a serious brain injury (19 cases), and the group only suffering from severe systemic disease (30 cases)] and nutrition (good or malnutrition), were analyzed. Also the relationship between the aEEG and the cranial ultrasound detected at the same time and the Gesell Developmental Scale at six months of corrected gestational age. Theχ2 test, two independent samples t-test and Logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results The aEEG of 52%(79/153) cases reached the level of normal full-term newborn at term of corrected gestational age, only 48% (74/153) were abnormal. The abnormal rate of aEEG results in relatively stable preterm infants decreased from 3/6 (<30 weeks) to 35%(13/37) at 34 ≤ - ≤ 36+6 weeks, but the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=1.998, P=0.353). The abnormal rate of aEEG results in the group suffering from a serious brain injury was higher than the relatively stable preterm infants [14/19 vs 44%(46/104) ,χ2=5.578, P=0.024]. In relatively stable preterm infants, there was no difference of the abnormal rate of the aEEG results between intrauterine malnutrition group and good nutrition group [46%(19/41) vs 43%(27/63),χ2=0.122, P=0.727]. Neither was between extrauterine malnutrition group and good nutrition group [52%(13/25) vs 42%(33/79),χ2=0.805, P=0.369]. Serious brain injury was independent risk factor of abnormal aEEG (OR=3.453, 95%CI: 1.177-10.132, P=0.024). The coincidence rate of aEEG and the cranial ultrasound examination or the scores of Gesell Developmental Scale was 57%(56/98) and 50%(10/20), respectively. Conclusions The brain catch-up development may appears early after birth in preterm infants, which are impaired by lower gestational age and the severe brain injury. It is more effective of aEEG for evaluating the brain development of preterm infants when combines with other methods.