Abstract:According to Article 10 of the 1982 Constitution,a dualist structure of land ownership was established in China.Such an institutional arrangement was originally intended to better protect rural land and the interest of peasants,but has now degenerated into the most serious discrimination against the peasants in China.Not only is the use of rural land strictly regulated,but the title of rural land cannot be transferred without being first expropriated by government and converted into state land.This article discusses the nature of the collective ownership of China's rural land,and aims to reconstruct a more peaceful and just land management regime. In contrast to the city land owned by the state or the whole people,the collectively owned rural land may acquire a degree of substantive ownership.Nevertheless,lessons from China's history indicate that the right to use the rural land shall ultimately resides in individual peasants or their households,and such individualized right shall be respected and protected by law.China's rural land has long been greatly devalued,however,by the legal restrictions on the right to use rural land.The irrational and discriminative regulatory regime over China's rural land needs fundamental reform,so as to return to the farmers the collective land property right as conferred by the 1982 Constitution,and to disconnect land expropriation with the urbanization process. In fact,the substantive issue associated with urbanization is the urban planning and the examination and approval of the land use change by local governments.In this respect,the existing planning process in China,seriously deficient in democratic participation,is often carried out at the mercy of official whim.The American experience of bringing rule of law to the local zoning and review processes may provide some inspiration for China.To assure the rationality of local planning and related examination and approval,it is indispensible to bring democracy to the legislative and civil participatory processes.It is also necessary to establish an appropriate judicial review mechanism to safeguard the legality of the purpose and procedure of planning.

Overturning and Re-overturning Tradition:How Peasants' Attitude towards Land was Shaped in the Land Reform in New Districts

The characteristics of flexibility,phase and consistence of reforming Chinese rural land system

The Impact of Urbanization on Farmland: is Division of Right to Contracted Management of Land a Reasonable Way Out?

Change of Rural Society after Farming Land Reform

On Distribution Change Mode Of Rural Resident Land In China

Review on the History of the Equalization of Land Ownership Thought and Its Implication

Paradox of Collective Ownership of China's Rural Land and Its Resolution

Economically-oriented Land Reform Vs Politically-Oriented Land Reform——rethinking Its Historical Significance

LAND CIRCULATION OF REPRESENTATIVE COUNTRIES(AREAS) AND ITS APOCALYPSE TO CHINA

Principles and control planning of Three-old Lands Reform of Guangdong Province

Path Choice for the Reform of Land Property and Its Transfer Policies

A Discussion on Some Issues of Traditional Land-Renting System

A Study of the Reform of the Land System in the Countryside of China

An Analysis on the Nature of Chinese Land Property Rights and Its Trajectory of Reform

Dilemmas And Breakthroughs On Land Uses Policy In China: Policy Exploration

Rural Reform in Contemporary China: Development, Efficiency, and Fairness

The Institutional Logic of the Evolution of Land Consolidation Policy in China:Analytical Framework and Historical Observation

The Impact of Land Requisition on Peasant Life in China

Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness?

Evolution of Farm Land Use Rights during Thirty Years of Reform in China:A Comparative Analysis of Policy Evolution and Its Implementation between 1978 and 2008

To Reallocate or Not: Reconsidering the Dilemma in China's Agricultural Land Tenure Policy