Curative effect of danhuang bugu fang on bone formation

Zhou Jun-jie,Cao Cheng-fu,Ji Bin,Cheng Xiang-yu,Wang Zhen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.31.019
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To observe the effect of Chinese herb of danhuang bugu fang on maintaining the bone volume and treating osteoporosis (OP). METHODS: From August 2003 to March 2006, 57 inpatients or outpatients with OP of Putuo Hospital were selected. They were all accorded with the west medical criteria of OP and differentiation of symptoms and signs in Chinese medicine: "atrophic debility of bones", "lumbago", "consumptive disease"and so on, which was characterized by "stasis and deficiency". All the patients were randomly divided into observation group (n=28) and control group (n=29). The patients in the observation group were orally taken 10 mL danhuang bugu fang every time (prepared by the subject team itself, composed of 5 g danshen, 4 g huangqi, 3 g buguzhi, 3 g chuanduan and so on), once daily for 12 weeks; the patients of the control group were orally taken the gusongbao granules (sugar-free, composed of yinyanghuo, chuanxiong, muli and so on), one sack every time, three times daily for 12 weeks. Then the clinical curative effect was evaluated by contrasted the bone density, the score of traditional Chinese medical syndrome and the biochemical index of bone metabolism.(1)Evaluation of changes in bone density: very effective: (after treatment-before treatment)/before treatment×100≥ 2%; effective: (after treatment-before treatment)/before treatment×100=0-2%; ineffective: (after treatment-before treatment)/before treatment×100 < 0. (2)Criteria of syndrome in Chinese medicine: Clinical recovery: the main symptoms disappeared, and the integral values decreased 95% (including 95%) or above; very effective: the main symptoms were improved, the initial value decreased 70%-94%; effective: the main symptoms were released, the original values decreased 30%-69%; ineffective: the main symptoms were not improved obviously, the original values decreased < 30%. RESULTS: All cases were involved in the result analysis. (1)In the observation group, 10 cases were very effective, 17 were effective and 1 case was ineffective; in the control group, 10 cases were very effective, 14 were effective and 5 cases were ineffective. There were significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). (2)There was no significant difference in the bone density of femur neck between the two groups before and after treatment [(0.70±0.04), (0.73±0.08), (0.69±0.02), (0.73 ±0.10) g/cm2; P > 0.05]; the score of syndromes in Chinese medicine after treatment was obviously decrease than that before treatment (9.32 ±3.86, 6.40±4.33; 9.75±3.67, 7.92±4.72; P < 0.05). (3)The concentration of calcium and phosphorus in blood of the two groups after treatment was significantly increased than that before treatment [(2.01±0.11), (2.28±0.13); (2.02±0.12), (2.16±0.34) mmol/L; (1.42±0.12), (1.12 ±0.09); (1.60±0.26), (1.50±0.37) mmol/L; P < 0.05], which had significant differences (P < 0.05); no significant difference was found in the concentration of alkaline phosphoric acid enzyme in blood in the two groups before and after treatment (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Danhuang bugu fang can maintain the bone volume and treat the primary osteoporosis, which is better than gusongbao granules in improving the score of syndromes in Chinese medicine and blood biochemical indexes of patients with OP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?