Is En Bloc Resection Essential for Endoscopic Resection of GI Neoplasia?
Takuji Gotoda,Tonya Kaltenbach,Roy Soetikno
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.008
IF: 10.396
2008-01-01
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Abstract:The endoscopic submucosal dissection technique allows en bloc resections even for larger lesions; an intact specimen provides proper orientation, sectioning, and margin assessment, and, ultimately, permits improved pathologic examination.Endoscopic resection of early GI cancer can be a curative treatment, because the risk of lymph-node involvement in well-differentiated cancers confined to the mucosa has been shown to be minimal. In fact, the metastases risk can even be absent, provided that certain criteria are met (size, depth of invasion, degree of differentiation, etc).1Soetikno R.M. Gotoda T. Nakanishi Y. et al.Endoscopic mucosal resection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 567-579Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (489) Google Scholar Endoscopic resections are associated with reduced morbidity, mortality, and cost compared with surgical therapy. As such, EMR has been practiced in Japan for the past 2 decades to remove small GI neoplasms, which include low-grade or high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma.2Hirao M. Masuda K. Ananuma T. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer and other tumors with local injection of hypertonic saline-epinephrine.Gastrointest Endosc. 1988; 34: 264-269Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (317) Google Scholar, 3Inoue H. Takeshita K. Hori H. et al.Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions.Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39: 58-62Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (520) Google Scholar, 4Akiyama M. Ota M. Nakajima H. et al.Endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric neoplasms using a ligating device.Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 45: 182-186Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar, 5Matsuzaki K. Nagao S. Kawaguchi A. et al.Newly designed soft prelooped cap for endoscopic mucosal resection of gastric lesions.Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 242-246Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (41) Google Scholar In Japan and in the Western countries, EMR also has primarily been used to remove large sessile colorectal adenomas and high-grade dysplasia. Overall, EMR has proved to be safe and efficacious.6Korenaga D. Haraguchi M. Tsujitani S. et al.Clinicopathological features of mucosal carcinoma of the stomach with lymph node metastasis in eleven patients.Br J Surg. 1986; 73: 431-433Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar, 7Ahmad N.A. Kochman M.L. Long W.B. et al.Efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection: a study of 101 cases.Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55: 390-396Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (332) Google Scholar However, the outcomes of EMR of larger intramucosal carcinomas of the esophagus or the stomach have been less ideal. Namely, the piecemeal resections required during the removal of a large lesion can lead to a higher risk of local recurrence8Katada C. Muto M. Manabe T. et al.Local recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus after EMR.Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 61: 219-225Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar, 9Tanabe S. Koizumi W. Mitomi H. et al.Clinical outcome of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy for early stage gastric cancer.Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56: 708-713Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (122) Google Scholar, 10Uraoka T. Saito Y. Matsuda T. et al.Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumours in the colorectum.Gut. 2006; 55: 1592-1597Crossref PubMed Scopus (337) Google Scholar and, furthermore, can make it difficult for the pathologist to render a precise depth and margin assessment of the lesion.11Pech O. May A. Gossner L. et al.Curative endoscopic therapy in patients with early esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.Endoscopy. 2007; 39: 30-35Crossref PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar, 12Eguchi T. Gotoda T. Oda I. et al.Is endoscopic one-piece mucosal resection essential for early gastric cancer?.Dig Endosc. 2003; 15: 113-116Crossref Scopus (91) Google Scholar, 13Zlatanic J. Waye J.D. Kim P.S. et al.Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy.Gastrointest Endosc. 1999; 49: 731-735Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (176) Google Scholar, 14Brooker J.C. Saunders B.P. Shah S.G. et al.Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations.Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55: 371-375Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (248) Google Scholar The minimal risk of lymph-node involvement in large early esophageal or gastric carcinomas, however, coupled with the potential curative role of endoscopic therapy, has provided the impetus for the development of a new technique of endoscopic resection to overcome the limitations of piecemeal removal. The endoscopic submucosal dissection technique allows en bloc resections even for larger lesions; an intact specimen provides proper orientation, sectioning, and margin assessment, and, ultimately, permits improved pathologic examination. The endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique was developed to allow en bloc resections, even for larger lesions.15Ono H. Kondo H. Gotoda T. et al.Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer.Gut. 2001; 48: 225-229Crossref PubMed Scopus (1352) Google Scholar An intact specimen provides proper orientation, sectioning, and margin assessment, and, ultimately, permits improved pathologic examination. Accurate histopathology is critical, because the criteria for a curative ESD are based on careful assessment of serial sectioning of the pathologic specimen. The final staging, unfortunately, cannot be accurately achieved with any imaging technique currently available and should only be assessed through precise histologic evaluation.16Yanai H. Noguchi T. Mizumachi S. et al.A blind comparison of the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopy in staging early gastric cancer.Gut. 1999; 44: 361-365Crossref PubMed Scopus (152) Google Scholar Hence, any treatment plan based on EUS recommendations potentially means that, in 10% to 20% of cases, the patients may be subjected to unnecessary surgery.17Akahoshi K. Chijiwa Y. Hamada S. et al.Pretreatment staging of endoscopically early gastric cancer with a 15 MHz ultrasound catheter probe.Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 48: 470-476Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (138) Google Scholar The technique also allows en bloc resection to be made through fibrotic submucosa, which is commonly found during resections of ulcerated early gastric carcinoma, an important advantage in the endoscopic therapy of ulcerated early gastric cancers. It has the potential to reduce recurrences that could occur from residual cells left behind at the vertical or lateral margins during piecemeal removal.18Yokoi C. Gotoda T. Oda I. et al.Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows curative resection of local recurrent early gastric cancer after prior endoscopic mucosal resection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2006; 64: 212-218Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar The current indications for ESD were developed based on the correlation between the depth of tumor invasion of large superficial early GI neoplasms and lymph-node metastasis observed from a surgical specimen.19Soetikno R. Kaltenbach T. Yeh R. et al.Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract.J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 4490-4498Crossref PubMed Scopus (484) Google Scholar Based on the analysis of more than 5000 patients, Gotoda et al20Gotoda T. Yanagisawa A. Sasako M. et al.Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers.Gastric Cancer. 2000; 3: 219-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (1453) Google Scholar showed that the risks of metastasis in larger early gastric carcinoma approaches zero when the tumors have specific features. These features have since been adapted as the expanded criteria for endoscopic resection of early gastric carcinoma. Recently, expansion of the indications for mucosal resection in patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma that involve the deeper layer of the mucosa (m3) and superficial layer of the submucosa (sm1) has been described.21Higuchi K. Tanabe S. Koizumi W. et al.Expansion of the indications for endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma.Endoscopy. 2007; 39: 36-40Crossref PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar In this issue of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Ishihara et al22Ishihara R. Iishi H. Takeuchi Y. et al.Local recurrence of large squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: 799-804Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar share their center's 12-year experience of performing endoscopic resection of large esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Of the 78 esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas 20 mm or more in diameter that were studied, en bloc resection was accomplished in 44% (34/78) of the lesions: EMR 11% (5/46 lesions) and ESD 91% (29/32 lesions). They noted that recurrences were only in lesions treated by piecemeal resection: the strongest predictor for local recurrence of large lesions was the number of resected pieces (0 in 34 en bloc resections [0%], 4 in 27 2- to 4-piece resections [15%]; 8 in 17 >5-piece resections [7%]). An increasing number of resected specimens and EMR were independently predictive factors for local recurrence after an endoscopic resection. In comparison, when using the ESD technique, they observed no recurrence and, at the same time, an overall low complication rate of 2 microperforations, which were managed conservatively with supportive measures. Furthermore, all post-ESD strictures underwent successful endoscopic balloon dilation. The retrospective analysis of Ishihara et al22Ishihara R. Iishi H. Takeuchi Y. et al.Local recurrence of large squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: 799-804Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar highlights the promise of ESD: improved patient outcomes by having a clearer pathologic stage and a higher chance of cure. It provides the basis for future larger studies to prospectively assess the outcomes of ESD for large early esophageal squamous-cell cancer. The long-term clinical outcomes will serve as the ultimate proof of its clinical application. An ESD for superficial GI neoplasms, nonetheless, has been explored since the early 1990s and is increasingly practiced throughout Japan. The technique's popularity has been attributed to the technical ability to endoscopically remove large GI neoplasia en bloc with less morbidity and mortality compared with surgical alternatives. ESD, however, is associated with significant drawbacks: long procedure times, low reimbursement, and higher procedure risks. It also requires an extensive training. For its future success, standardized training of ESD will need to be disseminated.23Gotoda T. Friedland S. Hamanaka H. et al.A learning curve for advanced endoscopic resection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62: 866-867Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar The proposed applications of ESD are listed in Table 1. The article by Ishihara et al22Ishihara R. Iishi H. Takeuchi Y. et al.Local recurrence of large squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67: 799-804Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (114) Google Scholar provides further information needed for ESD to become standard practice.Table 1Indications for endoscopic resection in early GI neoplasmOrganIndication∗The following macroscopic classification is used: IIa, slightly elevated superficial tumor; IIb, flat superficial tumor; IIc, slightly depressed superficial tumor.EsophagusWell and/or moderately differentiated m1 or m2 SCC-AC <20 mm, without venous or lymphatic involvement; less than a third of the circumference is involved because of the risk of post-resection stricture formationThe indication for the resection for Barrett's esophagus is still being studiedStomachStandard criteria: Well and/or moderately differentiated AC and/or papillary carcinoma; cancer confined to mucosa or IMC IIa <20 mm; cancer confined to mucosa or IMC IIb, IIc <10 mm; without evidence of venous or lymphatic involvementExpanded criteria: mucosal well and/or moderately differentiated AC, irrespective of size, without ulceration; if an ulcer is found, then the size of the lesion is ≤30 mm; if minute superficial submucosal invasion is found, then the size of the lesion is ≤30 mm, without venous or lymphatic involvement; mucosal undifferentiated AC ≤20 mm, without venous or lymphatic involvement, or ulcer findings,ColorectumLaterally spreading tumorsHGDThe indication for the resection of mucosal or slightly invasive carcinoma into the submucosa is still being studied; ESD has been reported for the resection of: • Well or moderately differentiated AC; cancer confined to mucosa: IIa <20 mm, IIb or IIc <10 mm, without venous or lymphatic involvement • Superficially invading the submucosa (<500 μ from the muscularis mucosa); without venous or lymphatic involvementm, Mucosa; SCC, squamous-cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; IMC, intramucosal cancer; HGD, high-grade dysplasia.∗ The following macroscopic classification is used: IIa, slightly elevated superficial tumor; IIb, flat superficial tumor; IIc, slightly depressed superficial tumor. Open table in a new tab m, Mucosa; SCC, squamous-cell carcinoma; AC, adenocarcinoma; IMC, intramucosal cancer; HGD, high-grade dysplasia. The authors report that there are no disclosures relevant to this publication.