Development of Research on Psychological Empowerment
Wang Jinliang,Zhang Dajun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2011.03.044
2011-01-01
Abstract:Psychological empowerment has attracted attention in the past 20 years from both researchers and practicers for its important role in an organization's development.In China,research on psychological empowerment is still at initial stage.This paper analyzed literature on psychological empowerment from the following aspects:structure of psychological empowerment,antecedents and outcome variables of psychological empowerment.Specifically,with regard to the structure of psychological empowerment, different opinions have been put forward.The single-dimension concept holds that psychological empowerment is the motivational component of self-efficacy.The three-dimension concept holds that psychological empowerment is composed of three dimensions including the intrapersonal component,the interactional component,and the behavioral component.The four-dimension concept holds that psychological empowerment includes working meaning,self-efficacy,self-determination,and impact.The six-dimension concept holds that psychological empowerment includes decision-making involvement,professional development,status,self-efficacy, determination,and impact.As to the relationship among psychological empowerment and its antecedents and outcome variables,three theoretical models were proposed.The first model is the five-stage model by Conger and Kanungo,which analyzed the development of psychological empowerment from a five-stage perspective,with each stage having their own missions such as identification of factors hindering development of psychological empowerment,eliminating these factors,self-efficacy promotion,empowerment feeling promotion,and the emergence of positive outcomes.The second model was proposed by Thomas and Velthouse,which analyzed the relationship among organizational environment,cognitive style,psychological empowerment,and individual behavior.The third model was proposed by Spreitzer,which focused on the relationship among individuals' locus of control,self-esteem,access to information, rewards,psychological empowerment,organizational management efficiency,and organizational innovation.From the empirical perspective,researchers have examined the effects of individual variables(mainly including socioeconomic variables and personality variables) and organizational variables(mainly including team spirit,leadership,organizational culture,access to information,role clarity,decision-participation,span of control,et al.) on psychological empowerment.As to its outcome variables,previous studies have found that psychological empowerment is positively related with individuals ' job satisfaction,professional commitment, organizational commitment,performance and mental health,but inconsistent findings still exist in the respect of the impacts of psychological empowemient' s dimensions on these outcomes.Previous research also suggested that the relationship among psychological empowerment and its antecedents and outcome variables might be influenced by some mediators and moderators.For instance,the tension between employees and their supervisors might moderate the relationship between employees' psychological empowerment and their commitment to the organization.Leadership support and organizational commitment were suggested as mediators between psychological empowerment and organizational citizenship behavior.Although lots of studies have been done on psychological empowerment,a close inspection on literature reveals that limitations still exist.First,the measurement needs to be further developed since so far no measurement has fully captured the phenomenon of psychological empowerment.Second,few studies have designed interventions to improve psychological empowerment.Third,there is a lack of research conducted from a perspective of social cognitive process perspective.Researchers may consider these limitations in their future research and enrich our understanding on psychological empowerment.