Abstract:Empirical legal studies can benefit from the research findings of cultural psychology to understand the fundamental principles of law. Research findings in cultural psychology have shown that Eastern Asian cultures and North American cultures differ significantly in value orientations, moral judgments and cognitive styles. East Asian values emphasize collectivism and North American values emphasize individualism. East Asians moral reasons are centered on the principles of duties and responsibilities whereas North American moral reasons are centered on the principles of autonomy and justice. East Asian cognitive styles tend to be more holistic, focusing on context, backgrounds and relations and the North American cognitive styles tend to be more analytic, focusing on objects, categories and dispositions. Such cultural differences have profound implications in legal understanding and legal practices, as laws are human machinery and are subject to the influence of human values, moralities and cognition. Mounting evidence in cross-cultural legal studies has shown East and West differences in causation inquiry, responsibility judgments, contract formation and mediation practices. Research indicates that East Asian causal reasoning is less likely to make the fundamental attribution error as North Americans do. East Asians’ responsibility judgments, compared with North Americans’, involve more contextual information (such as moral judgments) than the law actually warrants. East Asians’ contract formation may be more based on relational obligations than the North Americans’, which are rule based. The compensation judgments by East Asians appear to be based on the consequence whereas judgments made by North Americans seem to be based on intention judgments. East Asians also prefer mediation in conflict resolutions while North Americans prefer litigation in conflict resolutions. We argue that these differences could influence people’s understanding, construction and use of laws in fundamental ways. As the law attempts to further understand people, and as theorists continue to evaluate how human life and law influence each others, scholars in both psychology and law must challenge themselves to reflect on the law’s substantive and procedural standards being applied in different cultural groups.. We hope our paper can generate enough interests among Chinese psychologists and legal scholars to start the journey towards finding solutions that both considers cultural psychology’s empirical findings and effectuates our legal ideals. The cross-culture empirical legal studies hence not only provide a new paradigm for legal scholarship but also provide theoretical guidance for advancing Chinese legal studies in global stages as well as in resolving international legal disputes between people from China and other countries.

Face- saving and Law: A View of the Sociology of Law

Legal Realism and Criminal Justice in Transitional Society

Transforming the Evaluation of the Rule of Law in China

Generation and System Positioning of Social Law

On Society of Law

Chinese Legal Culture: From Tradition to Modernity

The “Legal-civil Relations” in the Rule-of-law Practice of Contemporary China

Difficulty in Filing a Lawsuit: Thinking on a "Chinese Issue"

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

An Analysis of Modernization of Chinese Legal Culture

Rule by Law, Emotion and Conscience

Face-Saving and Depressive Symptoms among U.S. Chinese Older Adults

An Administrative Law Faced to Social Science

Challenge and Contribution of Cultural Psychology to Empirical Legal Studies

A Study of Politeness in Chinese and English Culture and Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure

The Role of Face in a Chinese Context of Trust and Trust Building

Confucian Cultural Tradition and The Shaping Of Citizen’s Consciousness in Law Society

Society Transformation,Legalization,and Mediation

The Common Sense Perspective of Criminal Law

An Analysis of “Emotion, Reason and Law” in Chinese Traditional Legal Culture

Civil Summary Procedure and the Formation of the Society under the Rule of Law