Influence of Local Injury Treatment on theImplantation Related Factors and IVF Pregnancy Outcome

Yao WANG,Yun FENG,Zhi-hong NIU,Xiao-yan HUANG,Ai-jun ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-357X.2007.07.006
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the value and moleculor mechanism of local injury therapy in improving the endometrial receptivity. Methods: There were 120 infertile patients who had 140 IVF cycles, in which 60 of them were in the local injury group (group A) and the other 60 women were in control group (group B). Scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry were used to screen for the expression of pinopode, LIF and ostepontin (OPN) in the endometrium of two groups. Twenty non-pregnant women (group B2) from group B were taken to undergo local injury therapy and proceed with IVF treatment. The influence of the expression of pinopode, LIF and osteopontin before and after local injury therapy were also compared. Results: The expression of implantation related factors in group A and group B of the IVF patients were following: pinopode abundance 63.33% vs 36.67%, LIF 6.07 ± 1.33 vs 4.94 ± 2.26, OPN 6.36 ± 1.49 vs 5.28 ± 2.06. They showed more expression of pinopode and higher level of LIF, OPN in the endometrium of group A than in group B (P<0.05). The single embryo implantaion rate in group A was 27.78%, which was much higher than that in group B (14.29%, P<0.05). The expression of pinopode, LIF and OPN in group B2 before and after local injury treatment were following: pinopode abundance 10% vs 50%,LIF 4.50 ± 0.82 vs 6.33 ± 1.25, OPN 5.06 ± 0.98 vs 6.83 ± 1.46, respectively (P<0.05). A total of 140 IVF cycles were divided into the pregnancy group (62 IVF cycles) and the non-pregnancy group (78 IVF cycles) according to the outcomes of IVF-ET/ICSI. The implantation related factors expressed in the pregnancy group and the non-pregnancy group were following: pinopode abundance 54.84% vs 25.64%, LIF 6.94 ±1.03 vs 4.24±1.84, OPN 7.31±0.85 vs 4.52±1.65, respectively. These were also higher expression of the implantation related factors in the pregnancy group than in the non-pregnancy group (P<0.05). And they were correlative each other. Conclusion: Pinopode, LIF and OPN are important related factors in the implantation window. The abundant expression of pinopode and higher level of LIF, OPN in the endometrium may be closely related to the endometrial receptivity to implantation. Further more, the local injury may increase these implantation related factors and thus inhence the rate of IVF pregnancy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?