Paleomagnetic poles of mafic dyke swarms from the North China craton and their relevance to the reconstruction of the supercontinent Columbia.

Guiting Hou,Henry Halls,Don Davis,Baoling Huang,Mohan Yang,Chuancheng Wang
IF: 1.468
2009-01-01
Acta Petrologica Sinica
Abstract:One geomagnetic pole and two virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs) are now available from U-Pb dated dyke swarms/ individual dykes from the Eastern Block, Central Zone and Western Block of the North China craton. The precise baddeleyite U-Pb age of Hengshan GU dyke in the Central Zone is 1769±3Ma and is part of the Taihang dyke swarm. This swarm has yielded a paleomagnetic pole position at Plat =36°N, Plong = 247°E(dp = 2°, dm =4°). A dyke at location DY in the Eastern Block of the North China craton yields a baddeleyite U-Pb age of a baddeleyite 1620.8±6.9Ma, and a VGP at Plat =6.9°N, Plong = 81.9°E {dp = 4.31°,dm=6.09°). A nearby dyke at site LW4 gives a zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age of 1157±18Ma, and a VGP at Plat =27.1°N, Plong = 162°E( dp = 15.8°, dm = 18.7°). Although secular variation has not been removed from the Shandong data, comparison of these three paleomagnetic pole positions of the North China craton with the Mesoproterozoic APWP of the Canadian Shield allows a continental reconstruction whereby the North China craton joined the supercontinent Columbia with the Canadian Shield from 1800 to 1600Ma, and the North China craton separated from the Canadian Shield sometime between 1600 to 1200Ma in response to the final break-up of the supercontinent Columbia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?