Comparative Study of Optimized Purge Flow in a CO2 Capture System Using Different Sorbents

Yolanda Lara,Pilar Lisbona,Ana Martinez,Luis M. Romeo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.178
2009-01-01
Energy Procedia
Abstract:One of the most promising options for CO2 capture in large power generation facilities is the system based on the CO2 sorption loop. This method has gained rapid importance due to promising carbonator CO2 capture efficiency, the existence of low cost sorbents and the fact that no gas pre-treatment unit is needed before entering the system. The sum of these features results in a competitively low cost CO2 capture system when using low cost natural sorbents. Different regenerable sorbents are being investigated for large-scale CO2 capture purposes and high temperature Mg-based, Li-based and Ca-based sorbents are considered as suitable candidates. This study considers the applicability of lithium orthosilicatum, hydrated limestone and raw natural limestone. A basic configuration that makes use of two interconnected circulating fluidized beds (carbonator and calciner) has been studied. Among the key variables that influence the performance of these systems, the carbonation conversion of the sorbent and the heat requirement at calciner are the most relevant. Both variables are mainly influenced by sorbent/CO2 ratio and make-up flow (purge) of solids. Purge is necessary to mitigate the sorbent deactivation. Large sorbent/CO2 ratios improve the carbonation conversion but also increase the cost of the system due to a more intensive solid circulation. Large make-up flow also improves the extent of sorption phenomena and hence the CO2 capture, but increases the heat demand at calciner and the fresh sorbent cost. The aim of this paper is to calculate the optimum make-up flow of fresh sorbent and sorbent/CO2 ratio for a set of these regenerable sorbents in order to minimize the capture cost of the system integrated into a power plant. Resulting optimal values are compared to assess the energetic performance and CO2 capture cost of the cycle for each sorbent material.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?