Clinical application of modified cystectomy with preservation of erectile and ejaculatory functions for young men with bladder diseases

Ye Min,Huang Yunteng,Zhu Yingjian,Qi Jun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0848.2007.10.006
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To evaluate the clinical value of modified cystectomy with preservation of erectile and ejaculatory functions for young men with nonmalignant and malignant diseases of bladder. Methods Eighteen patiets, with mean age of 30 years (range 18 to 38), presented with bladder disease necessitating cystectomy, including tuberculous contractile bladder(4), extensive polypoid cystitis glandularis (5), late stage of neurogenic bladder (5), and recur-rent multiple non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (4). All patients strongly wished to maintain their fertility and potency after the operation. Modified simple cystectomy with preservation of the vasa deferentia, seminal vesicles, prostate and neurovascu-lar bundles, as well as construction of an ileocolic substitution of bladder (Goldwasser neobladder) or ileal substitution of bladder (Studer neobladder) were performed. Results Mean operative time was 350 min. Estimated mean intraoperative blood loss was 420 ml, and 7 cases needed blood transfusion. All patients, except 2 cases of nuerogenic bladder, voided spontaneously after removed the catheter. Intermittent self catheterization was needed to eliminate residual urine in 2 cases of nuerogenic bladder. Mean follow-up was 46 months (range 18 to 68 months). Erectile and ejaculatory functions were normal in all cases but one. Patients remained completely continent and voided normally. Upper uninary tracts were in excellent conditions in 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. There was no tumor recurrent in TCC patients. Conclusion Modified cystectomy with preservation of the vasa deferentia, seminal vesicles prostate and neurovascular bundle is an excellent and reliable option for young men who wish to maintain their fertility and potency after surgery, even for low risk cases with malignant bladder tumors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?