A validity study of three physical activity questionnaires

HU Bin,LIN Lan-fang,YUAN Zi-yu,YANG Ya-jun,LV Ming,YE Wei-min,YU Shun-zhang,JIN Li,WANG Xiao-feng
2013-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of International Physical Activity questionnaire-Short-Chinese version (I- PAQ-S-C), Global Physical Activity Questionnaire-Chinese version (GPAQ-C), and Total Energy Expenditure Questionnaire-Chinese version (TEEQ-C) by using pedometer as a criterion and to compare the concurrent validity of IPAQ-S-C and GPAQ-C with TEEQ-C, and IPAQ-S-C with GPAQ-C, respectively. METHODS Three hundred subjects were randomly sampled from five communities in Taizhou. The IPAQ-S-C, GPAQ-C, and TEEQ-C were administered before and after a 7-day time interval. During the time interval every participant was required to wear a pedometer. The validity of 3 physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) was assessed by comparing with pedometer. RESULTS Overall, 191 subjects were finally analyzed. The concurrent validity coefficients of heavy physical activity (PA) of IPAQ-S-C and GPAQ-C were 0.32 and 0.28, respectively, compared with those of TEEQ-C. Other concurrent validity coefficients of physical activity (PA) sub-component for IPAQ-S-C and GPAQ-C ranged from 0.4 to 0.6. In addition, the total sedentary hours per week of IPAQ-S-C, GPAQ-C and TEEQ-C were negatively correlated with those of the criterion pedometer (Spearman r=-0.24, -0.20 and-0.22, P﹤0.005). Only the total transport-related domain hours per week of GPAQ-C had a statistically correlation with the criterion pedometer (Spearman r=0.21, P﹤0.005). CONCLUSIONS Compared with TEEQ-C, the concurrent validity of IPAQ-S-C and GPAQ-C was acceptable. Compared with GPAQ-C, the concurrent validity of IPAQ-S-C was better. It should evaluate the using of pedometer as a criterion for validity of PAQs appraisal carefully.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?