Abstract:Hydrological models have been developed in response to the need to understand the complex water cycle of the Earth and to assess its interaction with historical and future climate scenarios. In the global water sector of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b), six land surface models (LSMs), eight hydrological models (GHMs), and one dynamic vegetation model (DGVM) are contributing with transient simulations spanning from 1660 to 2300. The model simulations follow a common protocol and are driven by common bias adjusted climate model outputs combined with plausible socio-economic scenarios and representative concentration pathways. The main goal of this study is to highlight similarities and differences among these models in simulating the vertical water balance. The main similarity of these models consists in the water cycle simulation, even if the models have been developed for different purposes such as energy cycle (LSMs), water cycle (GHMs), or vegetation cycle (DGVM) simulation. In particular, we address the following research question: 1) what equations are used to compute water storages and water fluxes; 2) how different are the equations among the models; 3) how the equations were adjusted; 4) how many parameters are used by the models; 5) how often the parameters are used; 6) how similar or different are the parameters among the models. To this end, we apply a standard writing style of the water storages and water fluxes included in the models, to easily identify the similarities and differences among them. Most of the models include in their structure the canopy, soil, and snow storages, and almost half of them include the groundwater storage. Furthermore, we find that: 1) a model needs a very good documentation, this would help to easily identify and understand the equations in the code; 2) some modelers teams use common approaches resulting in similar equations of water storages or water fluxes, but different models structures still lead to different models results; 3) collaboration and communication among the modelers are necessary, on the one hand, for the realization of the models standard writing style, and on the other hand, for a better understanding of the models themselves, especially their strengths, limitations and results. Overall, our results (i) help to better explain the different models results and to attribute these to the differences in simulating specific processes; (ii) contribute to the remarkable efforts in creating a common protocol and a common input datasets for well-defined simulations; (iii) foster a better understanding of how the models work and finding new ways of improvement and development.

Development of a Distributed Biosphere Hydrological Model and Its Evaluation with the Southern Great Plains Experiments (SGP97 and SGP99)

Extending the Integrated Richards Equation Method to New Boundary Conditions: Model Description and Validation

Assessment of a distributed biosphere hydrological model against streamflow and MODIS land surface temperature in the upper Tone River Basin

Modeling the Land Surface Water and Energy Cycles of A Mesoscale Watershed in the Central Tibetan Plateau During Summer with A Distributed Hydrological Model

Improving the Hydrology of the Simple Biosphere Model 2 and Its Evaluation Within the Framework of A Distributed Hydrological Model

Frozen Soil Parameterization in a Distributed Biosphere Hydrological Model

Evaluation and Application of A Fine-Resolution Global Data Set in A Semiarid Mesoscale River Basin with A Distributed Biosphere Hydrological Model

Development of WEP Model and Its Application to an Urban Watershed

A Distributed Hydrological Model-GBHNM and Its Application in Middle-Scale Catchment

Understanding Each Other's Models: an Introduction and a Standard Representation of 16 Global Water Models to Support Intercomparison, Improvement, and Communication

Similarities and Differences among Fifteen Global Water Models in Simulating the Vertical Water Balance

Distributed Hydrological Modeling Study with the Dynamic Water Yielding Mechanism and Rs/Gis Techniques

The Influence of Groundwater Representation on Hydrological Simulation and Its Assessment Using Satellite‐based Water Storage Variation

Modelling Hydrologic Processes In The Mekong River Basin Using A Distributed Model Driven By Satellite Precipitation And Rain Gauge Observations

Application of Distributed Hydrological Model in the Asian Monsoon Tropic Region with A Perspective of Coupling with Atmospheric Models

Integrated Surface Water-Groundwater Modeling for Interpreting Ecohydrological Processes in Large Arid and Semi-Arid River Basins

Expanding Distributed Hydrological Modelling to the Continental Scale

Application of a Distributed Hydrological Model to the Yellow River Basin

Modification of IBIS and Distributed Simulation of Eco-hydrological Progress with It in Multi-scale Watersheds

Development and validation of a physically-based, national-scale hydrological model in China

Coupling Simulation of Water and Energy Budgets and Analysis of Urban Development Impact