Abstract:The Anthropocene is defined by human‐driven environmental change, with one consequence being the modern dramatic decline in biodiversity globally. This is especially worrisome given the long‐acknowledged causal linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and the delivery of ecosystem services. However, the exact mechanisms driving biodiversity–ecosystem function (BEF) relationships remain unclear, specifically the linkages between species differences, measured by trait and phylogenetic distances, and how interactions, such as competitive inequality and stable coexistence via niche partitioning, influence these relationships. Using complementary plant biodiversity experiments, a synthetic‐assembled one that combined species in different phylogenetic distance treatments with a semi‐natural functional group removal experiment, we assessed how species differences influence the mechanisms underpinning BEF relationships. We calculated the net biodiversity effect (ΔY) of biomass production and partitioned it into two additive parts: the complementarity and selection effects at species and functional group level to test how phylogenetic diversity and functional diversity capture the influences of the complementarity and selection effects. For both experiments, we found that phylogenetic and functional diversity explained biodiversity effects through similar mechanisms, with a positive relationship with the complementarity effect, and a negative relationship with the selection effect. However, we found that the selection effect was best predicted by a negative relationship with functional dispersion (FDis) of height where the selection effect was strongest in plots with similarly tall species and weakest with a greater diversity of heights, while higher complementary effects were best explained by increasing phylogenetic diversity (i.e. high MPDa). Our work revealed that the mechanisms underpinning biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships are dependent on species differences and how these differences influence competitive inequalities and niche differences.

Effects of Inter-Specific Variability on Biomass Allocation: A Hierarchical Bayesian Approach.

Scaling Relationships Between Leaf Mass and Total Plant Mass Across Chinese Forests

Quantifying Effects of Habitat Heterogeneity and Other Clustering Processes on Spatial Distributions of Tree Species

Biogeographical Patterns of Forest Biomass Allocation Vary by Climate, Soil and Forest Characteristics in China

Stem, branch and leaf biomass-density relationships in forest communities

Effects of Plant Traits and the Relative Abundance of Common Woody Species on Seedling Herbivory in the Thousand Island Lake Region

Effects of Biotic and Abiotic Factors on Forest Biomass Fractions

Relationships among the Stem, Aboveground and Total Biomass Across Chinese Forests

Biomass Allocation of Stoloniferous and Rhizomatous Plant in Response to Resource Availability: A Phylogenetic Meta-Analysis

Distinguishing niche and neutral processes: issues in variation partitioning statistical methods and further perspectives

Advance in relationship between biomass and density of plant communities

Distribution of Biomass Dynamics in Relation to Tree Size in Forests Across the World

Biomass allocation of trees in response to mono- and heterospecific neighbourhoods

Within-twig biomass allocation in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved species along an altitudinal gradient: allometric scaling analysis

Environmental variation, functional diversity and identity predicting community biomass in an old-growth subtropical broad-leaved forest

Greater than the sum of the parts: how the species composition in different forest strata influence ecosystem function

Nitrogen addition affects plant biomass allocation but not allometric relationships among different organs across the globe

Dynamic carbon allocation trade‐off: A robust approach to model tree biomass allometry

Stronger Effects of Biodiversity Loss and Compositional Change on Forest Biomass Dynamics at Larger Spatial Scales

Precipitation Dominates the Allocation Strategy of Above- and Belowground Biomass in Plants on Macro Scales

Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity Explain Different Components of Diversity Effects on Biomass Production