Who should Pay for Housing Security Programs:The Central Government or Local Governments?
Siqi Zheng,Yuming Fu,Rongrong Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-2486.2009.06.006
2009-01-01
Abstract:A serious of housing security programs in China have been launched since 1990s.However,the effects of which were not significant due much to the lack of regular and enough fiscal resources.What remains unclear is who should be responsible for the finance such programs.Should it be the central government,or local governments? By referring to the theories of wefalre state and that of public finance,this paper seeks to answer this question.The state of housing in the US is examined within this theoretical context.It is argued that the central government should play a primary role in financing housing security programs because"housing security"as its stands is a sort of social welfare that is mainly achieved through income redistribution which should coincide with the central government's fiscal as well as social policy agenda that aims at social justice.The fact of which,however, should not prevent local government from sharing part of the cost of such programs, and,more importantly,take up the responsibility of implementation.Nevertheless, institutional restrictions in China,such as the social security system and the household registration system,determine the shift of the fiscal responsibility of housing security programs from local governments to the central government has to be a gradual process.