Relationship of Signaling Pathways between RKIP Expression and the Inhibition of EMT-Inducing Transcription Factors SNAIL1/2, TWIST1/2 and ZEB1/2
Andrew Bustamante,Stavroula Baritaki,Apostolos Zaravinos,Benjamin Bonavida
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183180
2024-09-17
Abstract:Untreated primary carcinomas often lead to progression, invasion and metastasis, a process that involves the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Several transcription factors (TFs) mediate the development of EMT, including SNAIL1/SNAIL2, TWIST1/TWIST2 and ZEB1/ZEB2, which are overexpressed in various carcinomas along with the under expression of the metastasis suppressor Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP). Overexpression of RKIP inhibits EMT and the above associated TFs. We, therefore, hypothesized that there are inhibitory cross-talk signaling pathways between RKIP and these TFs. Accordingly, we analyzed the various properties and biomarkers associated with the epithelial and mesenchymal tissues and the various molecular signaling pathways that trigger the EMT phenotype such as the TGF-β, the RTK and the Wnt pathways. We also presented the various functions and the transcriptional, post-transcriptional and epigenetic regulations for the expression of each of the EMT TFs. Likewise, we describe the transcriptional, post-transcriptional and epigenetic regulations of RKIP expression. Various signaling pathways mediated by RKIP, including the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway, inhibit the TFs associated with EMT and the stabilization of epithelial E-Cadherin expression. The inverse relationship between RKIP and the TF expressions and the cross-talks were further analyzed by bioinformatic analysis. High mRNA levels of RKIP correlated negatively with those of SNAIL1, SNAIL2, TWIST1, TWIST2, ZEB1, and ZEB2 in several but not all carcinomas. However, in these carcinomas, high levels of RKIP were associated with good prognosis, whereas high levels of the above transcription factors were associated with poor prognosis. Based on the inverse relationship between RKIP and EMT TFs, it is postulated that the expression level of RKIP in various carcinomas is clinically relevant as both a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker. In addition, targeting RKIP induction by agonists, gene therapy and immunotherapy will result not only in the inhibition of EMT and metastases in carcinomas, but also in the inhibition of tumor growth and reversal of resistance to various therapeutic strategies. However, such targeting strategies must be better investigated as a result of tumor heterogeneities and inherent resistance and should be better adapted as personalized medicine.