Inhibition of AKT3 to Increase Migration and Metastasis by Upregulation of S100A4 Protein Expression.
Florian Ewald,Astrid Grottke,Tobias Lange,Udo Schumacher,Bjoern Nashan,Manfred Juecker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.11023
IF: 45.3
2015-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:11023 Background: The treatment of patients with distant metastases represents one of the biggest challenges in modern oncology, and the occurrence of metastases often determines the prognosis of the disease. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms facilitating the development of metastasis is of paramount importance. It was previously shown that activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway is a requirement for the ability of tumour cells to disseminate and form metastases. However, single AKT isoforms (AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3) were shown to have different, and even opposing functions regarding the regulation of cancer cell migration in vitro, giving rise to the hypothesis that inhibition of distinct AKT isoforms might have undesirable effects on cancer progression. The aim of this project therefore is to investigate the functions of the specific AKT isoforms regarding migration and metastasis of cancer cells. Methods: Three cell lines were used to generate single and double AKT isoform knockdown cells. Migration and invasion of these cells was analysed in vitro using live imaging migration, chemotaxis, and invasion assays. Metastatic potential of AKT isoform knockdown MDA-MB-231 cells was evaluated in a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model in vivo. Results: Knockdown of AKT3, but not AKT1 or AKT2, results in increased migration and scattering in vitro, and this effect was even more pronounced in AKT2/AKT3, and AKT1/AKT3 double knockdown cells. Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate that knockdown of AKT2/AKT3 and AKT1/AKT3 results in an increased number of lung metastasis, as detected by Alu PCR and upon histological examination. We found that AKT3 specifically regulates the expression of the metastasis promoting protein S100A4 via regulation of NFAT5 in MDA-MB-231 cells, and knockdown of S100A4 or NFAT5 were able to reverse the AKT3 induced increase in migration. Conclusions: Our study provides novel insight into the specific contribution of each AKT isoform to the regulation of migration and metastasis, and our results indicate that inhibition of AKT3 might cause adverse effects on cancer dissemination and progression. Therefore, our results provide a rationale for the development of AKT isoform specific inhibitors.