Abstract:Three Bayesian related approaches, namely, variational Bayesian (VB), minimum message length (MML) and Bayesian Ying-Yang (BYY) harmony learning, have been applied to automatically determining an appropriate number of components during learning Gaussian mixture model (GMM). This paper aims to provide a comparative investigation on these approaches with not only a Jeffreys prior but also a conjugate Dirichlet-Normal-Wishart (DNW) prior on GMM. In addition to adopting the existing algorithms either directly or with some modifications, the algorithm for VB with Jeffreys prior and the algorithm for BYY with DNW prior are developed in this paper to fill the missing gap. The performances of automatic model selection are evaluated through extensive experiments, with several empirical findings: 1) Considering priors merely on the mixing weights, each of three approaches makes biased mistakes, while considering priors on all the parameters of GMM makes each approach reduce its bias and also improve its performance. 2) As Jeffreys prior is replaced by the DNW prior, all the three approaches improve their performances. Moreover, Jeffreys prior makes MML slightly better than VB, while the DNW prior makes VB better than MML. 3) As the hyperparameters of DNW prior are further optimized by each of its own learning principle, BYY improves its performances while VB and MML deteriorate their performances when there are too many free hyper-parameters. Actually, VB and MML lack a good guide for optimizing the hyper-parameters of DNW prior. 4) BYY considerably outperforms both VB and MML for any type of priors and whether hyper-parameters are optimized. Being different from VB and MML that rely on appropriate priors to perform model selection, BYY does not highly depend on the type of priors. It has model selection ability even without priors and performs already very well with Jeffreys prior, and incrementally improves as Jeffreys prior is replaced by the DNW prior. Finally, all algorithms are applied on the Berkeley segmentation database of real world images. Again, BYY considerably outperforms both VB and MML, especially in detecting the objects of interest from a confusing background.

The Updating Algorithm of Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Background Model

Adaptive Background Update Based on Gaussian Mixture Model under Complex Condition

A revision for gaussian mixture density decomposition algorithm

Recursive Gaussian Mixture Models for Adaptive Process Monitoring

Multi-Channel Adaptive Mixture Background Model for Real-time Tracking.

An Improved Gaussian Mixture Model for Background Estimation

Update The Gmms Via Adaptive Kalman Filtering

New Method Of Background Update For Video-Based Vehicle Detection

A Novel Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Model for Background Subtraction.

Adaptive Model Update Strategy for Correlation Filter Trackers.

Adaptive Background Model for Arbitrary-Long Stationary Target.

Adaptive moving target detection algorithm based on Gaussian mixture model

Optimization of Gaussian mixture model motion detection algorithm

A New Self-Adaptive Algorithm for Background Constructing and Update

Learning Gaussian Mixture with Automatic Model Selection: A Comparative Study on Three Bayesian Related Approaches

Research of Detection of Moving Objects Based on Gaussian Mixture Background Model

Future-data Driven Modeling of Complex Backgrounds Using Mixture of Gaussians

Object Kinematic Model: A Novel Approach Of Adaptive Background Mixture Models For Video Segmentation

Adaptive Background Updating Algorithm for Traffic Congestion Detection Based on Kalman Filtering and Inter-Frame Centroid Distanc

An Adaptive Background Modeling Method for Foreground Segmentation

Video Background Segmentation Using Adaptive Background Models