The study on efficacy evaluation of treatment the type of hyperactivity of liver yang of Migraine without Aura by meridian

万明雨,黄银兰,梁希森,何卫国,梁繁荣,贾红云,哈静,王磊,曹丽翠
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2013.04.102
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the differences between,meridian and non channel and Acupoint treatment the type of hyperactivity of liver yang of Migraine without Aura. Methods 28 patients were randomly divided into 2 groups,Meridian group14 cases,acupunctured ipsilateral SJ20,SJ 5,GB34 and GB40;non Channel and Acupoint group 14 cases,acupunctured ipsilateral 4 non Channed and Acupoint of points.Both groups were daily treatment,a total of 10 times.Before and after treatment and after treatment of 3 months,respectively,used The VAS and The MSQ evaluation. Results(l) effect:The VAS and The MSQ evaluation of after treatment of the 2 groups were significantly higher than before treatment(P<0.05).The VAS and The MSQ evaluation of after treatment of Meridian group were significantly higher than before treatmentof non Channed and Acupoint group(P<0.05).(2) prostecdtive efficacy:The VAS and The MSQ evaluation of after 3 months treatment of Meridian group were significantly higher than before treatment(P<0.05).But there were no difference between after 3 months treatment of the non Channel and Acupoint group and before treatment of the non Channel and Acupoint group(P>0.05). Conclusion The efficacy and prospective efficacy of treatment the type of hyperactivity of liver yang of Migraine without Aura by meridian were better than the non Channel and Acupoint.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?