The investigation of high risk type human papillomavirus prevalence and incidence rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Shenzhen women with different screen

WU Rui-fang,ZHOU Qing-zhi,LIU Zhi-hua,LI Rui-zhen,HAN Chun-yan,SHI Ju-fang,LI Jun-hua,ZHANG Li-jie,LI Ni,QIAO You-lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3639.2007.09.003
2007-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:HPV infection is known as the primary cause of cervical cancer worldwide To investigate high risk type human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and incidence rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and their screen risk factors in women with different methods of screening.Methods:1137 residents, workers and service women aged 15-59 from Shenzhen city were investigated for cervical cancer in an epidemiology screening study.The high risk types of human papillomavirus of liquid-based cytology samples were tested by hybrid capture 2 (HC-Ⅱ) and liquid-based cytology test (LCT) was also performed at the same time. Women for HPV-positive with LCT ≥ atypical squamous cells of undetermined sign (ASCUS) or HPV-negative with LCT ≥ low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) were biopsied in colposcopy and then were examined by pathology. All data was managed by Foxbase. Χ2 test and unconditional Logistic regression model were used for data analysis by SPSS 10.0.Results:1137 women were eligible in our research, the overall rates of HPV infection was 14.0%. HPV detection rates in residents, workers and service women were 14.1%,9.2%,18.9% respectively. HPV detection rates in workers group was significantly lower than that of service women and residents (P<0.01, P<0.05). There were no difference in HPV infection rates in each age group of residents and workers. HPV infection rates in groups aged 15-24 and 25-29 of service women were 23.0% and 28.2% and HPV infection rates in groups aged 30-34 and 35-59 were 11.3% and 12.9%. HPV infection rates in groups aged 15-24 and 25-29 were higher than that of group aged 30-34 and 35-59(P<0.01). Incidence of CIN was 4.4% in the research. CIN Ⅰ incidence was higher than that of CIN Ⅱ and CIN Ⅲ. CIN incidence in residents, workers and service women were 3.8%, 2.8% and 7.4%. Incidence of CIN in service women was significantly higher than that of residents, workers (P<0.05). There was no cervical cancer in our research. HPV detection rate in the ≥CIN Ⅱ were 100.0%.Univariate and multivariate analysis showed high risk types HPV infection was only factor of CIN (P=0.000, OR=43.431), number of sex partners ≥3, duration of regular sex relations maintained regularily for less than one year were strongly associated with HPV infection.Conclusions:HPV infection is the main risk factor for CIN in this study. HPV prevalence and CIN incidence of service women less than 30 years old are higher and they should be closely monitored.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?