Abstract:Since 1950 s,the role of innovation in driving economic growthattracts more and more scholars and practioners. After decades of development,research on innovation has become increasingly multi-disciplinary as scholars from different disciplines collaborate to address the significant issue of innovation management.Enterprise is the main actors for innovation. Thus,innovative enterprise is micro-foundation of sustainable economic development.Due to weak technological base,enterprise in China has experienced technology catch-up phase based on the advantage of latecomer.However,firm innovation system building activities in these enterprises are still stay in the technical management phase. Most enterprises in China simply consider innovation as technological issues,rather than a sort of totalinnovation management paradigm that including strategy, market, organizational, institutional, and cultural elements in building firm innovation system. Following Schumpeter's view that innovation is a new combination of elements,enterprises in China make great efforts in building a technological system,rather than a firm innovation system. This paper argues that firms overestimating technological issues and overlooking nontechnological issue result in a lack of innovative vitality.By backtracking relevant theories on innovation,this paper suggests that research on innovation can be divided into two categories:innovation of economics and innovation of management. The former emphasizes exploring the macro level mechanisms of the way innovation drives economic development,and the latter concentrates on the micro-level analysis of the mechanisms of leveraging firms' innovative capabilities. However,the issue of driving forces of firm innovation system is less discussed.Based on the theoretical background,this paper put forward a dual core model that may helps firms build a successful firm innovation system. The dual core refers to firm's innovative capabilities and driving forces for innovation. On the one hand,firm's system of innovative capabilities should include technological,financial,cultural and all-involvement innovation( AII) activities.Specifically,technological capabilities is key to firms' competitive advantages; financial capabilities can facilitate the knowledge accumulation by providing enough RD expenditure; cultural capabilities can help guide,regulate and coordinate the behavior of the members of the organization and thus affecting the organization's ability to innovate; AII is key to boosting innovation by high involvement of employees. On the other hand,firm's system driving forces of innovation should include technology-push,market-pull,governance-push and all innovators-pull. Specifically,technology change helps firms update their knowledge base and promote more innovative products; market orientation helps firms better understand customer needs and develop more new products through user innovation paradigm; the governance and entrepreneurship helps point out the firms' direction for innovation and future development; all innovators can help implement the firms' innovation strategy by high involvement of employees.

A Framework of the Interpretation of the "triple Helix" Model of National Theory Innovation:Taking the Inclusive Growth and Inclusive Development for Example

An introduction of the Triple Helix Model and its application in China

Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future

Exploring the Triple Helix Synergy in Chinese National System of Innovation

Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society

Neo-Triple Helix Model of Innovation Ecosystems: Integrating Triple, Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Models

return The Triple Helix of Innovation

The triple helix perspective of innovation systems

Exploration on Triple Helix Model of University-Government-Industry Partnership

The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, . . ., and an N-tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-based Economy?

The Triple Helix As a Model for Innovation Studies

The triple helix collaboration: lessons from a Chinese provincial innovation ecosystem

Research on Cultivation Mode and Countermeasures of Innovative Talents under Background of Digital Economy

Three-Level Model For All Elements Innovation Mechanism And Its Empirical Research

Triple helix relationship research on China's regional university–industry–government collaborative innovation: Based on provincial patent data

The Strategy Thinking for Building up Innovation Building up Firm Innovation System with the Dual Core Model

All Element Innovation Consolidating The Foundation Of All Involvement Innovation

Triple Helix Model of University–Industry–Government Cooperation in the Context of Uncertainties

University‐industry‐government triple helix relationship and regional innovation efficiency in China

The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (february 2012)