Abstract:I have argued that early human embryos are not human beings, and do not have normal rights. Like human sperm and ova, they are both alive and biologically human. However, they lack the physiological development necessary to sustain a capacity for sentience. If Ford is right, then they are not yet individual human organisms. But the more important point is that their lack of a capacity for sentience makes them inappropriate candidates for the ascription of moral rights. Thus, research on human embryos produced in vitro is not a wrong against them--at least so long as experimentally manipulated embryos are not returned to the womb, or artificially gestated to a stage at which they might become sentient. Some of the more difficult issues about embryo experimentation involve the rights of women as experimental subject and donors. The consent of both male and female gamete donors should normally be required for the production or experimental use of IVF embryos. (Possible exceptions might include cases in which one or both progenitors have died, and the survivor or other responsible family member wished to donate the (frozen) IVF embryos for research or other uses.) However, it is women's rights that are most apt to be endangered, for example, if the large scale therapeutic or commercial use of human embryos leads to a demand for large numbers of ova. Thus, it is vital that researchers and policy-makers heed feminist concerns about embryo research and the new biomedical technologies it may yield. Given adequate information and appropriate procedural protections, women are capable of making autonomous decisions about donating ova or embryos for biomedical research. But regulatory safeguards are needed to ensure against their being coerced, deceived, or manipulated into becoming ovum or embryo donors. As Daniel Callahan has detailed, biomedical technology has reached the point where we can no longer afford to provide everyone with all of the innovative therapies that might prove beneficial (Callahan, 1989, p 523). Thus, questions about the just and cost-effective distribution of medical resources will become increasingly difficult and important. Among these questions will be whether it is wise or just to invest large sums in the development of innovative methods of assisting human reproduction. We must also consider the interests of future persons who may suffer because of the methods used to bring them into existence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Ethical Defense and Reflection on "Designed Babies" Technology

Legal Issues Concerning Artificial Birth Technology

Ethical and legal issues concerning assisted reproductive technology

Debating Ethical Issues in Genome Editing Technology

Analysing our qualms about "designing" future persons: autonomy, freedom of choice, and interfering with nature

Discussion on Ethical Dilemma Caused by Artificial Intelligence and Countermeasures

Translational Bioethics in China: Brain-Computer Interface Research as a Case Study

Embryo manipulation and experimentation

Nano-ethics:Ethics Seeking for the Future Safety

Ethical Consideration about Assisted Reproductive Technology Implementation

Ethical Conflicts and Countermeasure for Medical High-tech Applications

Medical ethics considerations on artificial intelligence

Ethical Issues and Response Strategies of Intelligent Robot Technology

Surrogate Pregnancy: Ethical Considerations

The Ethics of Human Embryo Editing via CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Arguments, Reasons, and Concerns

Ethical Considerations on Some Issues of Medical Artificial Intelligence Applications

Ethics Review of the Research of Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Ethical Problems and Countermeasures of Artificial Intelligence Technology

More Process, Less Principles: The Ethics of Deploying AI and Robotics in Medicine

[In search of a new morality. Ethical considerations on the Amstad Report]

Thinking and Countermeasures in Clinical Teaching of Common Ethical Issues Caused by Assisted Reproductive Technology