Identifying Unexpected Accruals: a Comparison of Current Approaches

Jacob Thomas,Xiao-jun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-4254(00)00016-8
IF: 3.629
2000-01-01
Journal of Accounting and Public Policy
Abstract:While prior research, as noted in our paper, often uses various accrual prediction models to detect earnings management, not much is known about the accuracy, both relative and absolute, associated with these models. Our paper investigates the accuracy of six different accrual prediction models, and offers the following findings. Only the Kang – Sivaramakrishnan (1995) model performs moderately well. The remaining five models provide little ability to predict total accruals: they are less accurate than a naı̈ve model which predicts that total accruals equal −5% of the total assets (TA) for all firms and years. Conventional R2 values from a regression of actual accruals on predicted accruals are less than zero for a substantial majority of firms for these five models. These low R2 values in the prediction period contrast sharply with the much higher R2 values that are obtained within the estimation period. Similar performance is observed when predicting current accruals alone. However, the relative rankings of the different models are altered somewhat: the Jones (1991) model is then the only model that exhibits some predictive ability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?