A Genome-Wide Association Study of Mitochondrial DNA in Chinese Men Identifies Two Risk Single Nucleotide Substitutions for Idiopathic Oligoasthenospermia
Chuncheng Lu,Miaofei Xu,Rong Wang,Yufeng Qin,Jing Ren,Wei Wu,Ling Song,Shoulin Wang,Zuomin Zhou,Hongbing Shen,Jiahao Sha,Zhibin Hu,Yankai Xia,Dengshun Miao,Xinru Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2015.07.007
IF: 4.534
2015-01-01
Mitochondrion
Abstract:Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is believed to be both the source and target of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mtDNA genetic alterations have been reported to be associated with molecular defects in the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system. In order to investigate the potentially susceptible mtDNA genetic variants to oligoasthenospermia, we conducted a two-stage study in 921 idiopathic infertile men with oligoasthenospermia and 766 healthy controls using comprehensive molecular analysis. In the screen stage, we used next generation sequencing (NGS) in 233 cases and 233 controls to screen oligoasthenospermia susceptible mitochondrial genetic variants. In total, seven variants (C5601T, T12338C, A12361G, G13928C, A15235G, C16179T and G16291A) were screened to be potentially associated with idiopathic oligoasthenospermia. In the validation stage, we replicated these variants in 688 cases and 533 healthy controls using SNPscan. Our results demonstrated that the genetic alteration of C16179T was associated with idiopathic male infertility (odds ratio (OR) 3.10, 95% CI 1.41-6.79) (p=3.10×10(-3)). To elucidate the exact role of the genetic variants in spermatogenesis, two main sperm parameters (sperm count and motility) were taken into account. We found that C16179T was associated with both low sperm count and motility, with ORs of 4.18 (95% CI 1.86-9.40) (p=1.90×10(-4)) and 3.17 (95% CI 1.40-7.16) (p=3.50×10(-3)), respectively. Additionally, A12361G was found to be associated with low sperm count, with an OR of 3.30 (95% CI 1.36-8.04) (p=5.50×10(-3)). These results indicated that C16179T influenced both the process of spermatogenesis and sperm motility, while A12361G may just only participate in the process of spermatogenesis. Further investigation in larger populations and functional characterizations are needed to validate our findings.