Abstract:BACKGROUND: Many studies have been conducted about cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there are few reports about the differences between cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty in China. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment effects of cemented and uncemented bipolar prostheses on fracture of femoral neck in the elderly. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING: Comparative observation. The patients were selected from Department of Orthopaedics, Xi’an Red Cross Hospital from January 2004 to December 2005. PARTICIPANTS: 131 cases of femoral neck fractures (type Garden Ⅲ and Ⅳ) were selected from Department of Orthopaedics Xi’an Red Cross Hospital, including 39 males and 92 females, aged 79 years (ranging 65-98 years); 72 cases of left hip and 59 cases of right hip. METHODS: The patients with various basic diseases were given corresponding treatment before surgery. The operation was performed 3 or 4 days after admission by the same operator. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, who were separately treated with cemented or uncemented prostheses. The patients were followed up for 3 years after operation and the hip function was evaluated by Harris score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hip function, Harris score, mortality revision rate, revision rate and complication incidence rate. RESULTS: During follow-up period, 6 in cemented group and 8 in uncemented group died. After 3 month of operation, 43 patients could walk independently, 15 needed walking aid, and 5 only acted on bed in cemented group. In uncemented group, 27 patients could walk independently, and 35 needed walking aid. In hospital, 9 patients of cemented group and 15 of uncemented group had complication. After 3 years of operation, 14 cases underwent revision in cemented group due to prosthesis loosening with revision rate of 23.73%, while only 5 patients underwent revision in uncemented group, including 4 cases of prosthesis loosening and 1 of femur split with a revision rate of 23.73%. One year after operation, there was no statistically significance in Harris scores between two groups. During follow-up period, there was no difference in acetabular abrasion between two groups, but the uncemented group had a higher medullary cavity possession rate. No prosthesis dislocation, heterotopic ossification, or bone dissolving was found. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in hip function between cemented and uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly during follow up.

Cemented versus uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly