Genetic Structure of Paphiopedilum micranthum Populations from Core Distribution in Southeast Yunnan

LI Zong-yan,LI Jing,ZENG Wan-biao,LI Ming-yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2013.03.021
2013-01-01
Abstract:Paphiopedilum micranthum is a rare and endangered orchid known as slipper orchid.Its survival had been so seriously threatened that it lead to a drastic decline in number and range of wild populations because of commercial need and habitation destruction.In order to assess the influence on genetic structure of P.micranthum and provide fundamental information for its protection,167 samples from seven populations under the different disturb circumstance in the germplasm collection area-southeast yunnan limestone region were drawn to detect its genetic diversity and structure within and among populations by sequence-related amplified polymorphism(SRAP)technology.Molecular marker revealed that it had a high level of genetic diversity at species level(PPB=81.25%;I=0.3709)despite small population sizes,a quiet low level at population(PPB=47.92%;I=0.2348),a moderate mean genetic distance among population(D=0.1268).Analysis of molecular variance(AMOVA)indicated that the contribution(66.27%)of variability came within population level and account for 33.73% of total variability,which was consist with the coefficient of genetic differentiation among populations(Gst=0.3568).P.micranthum maintained significantly higher population differentiation compared to other outcrossing orchid species(Nm=0.902).The 7 populations could be divided into two subgroups at genetic similarity coefficient of 0.863.There was no significant correlation among population genetic distance and geographical distance.The current studies suggested that mating system,selective collection,habitats destroyed,and fragmented lead to loss of genetic diversity within populations and aggravated gene differentiation.In addition,gene drift and adaptation evolution were very important reasons responsible for a high genetic differentiation.While genetic flow might be not the main factor for differentiation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?