One-year Survival Follow-Up and Risk Factors Analysis of Clinically Amyopathic Dermatomyositis Complicated by Acute/subacute Interstitial Pneumonia

Qiang GUO,Getu ZHAORI,Meifang WU,Aihua QU,Di WU,Shuang YE,Chunde BAO
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the one-year survival status of patients with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis complicated by acute/subacute interstitial pneumonia (CAMD-A/SIP) receiving different treatment regimens, and to analyze its risk factors. Methods Totally 51 hospitalized patients with CAMD-A/SIP who treatment during Jan. 1998 to Dec. 2007 in the Shanghai Renji Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the one-year-survival curve of patients receiving different treatment regimes. COX regression was used to analyze risk factors of CAMD-A/SIP. Results Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the one-year survival rate of patients receiving steroid alone (95% CI: 1.03-4.57) was significantly lower compared to those receiving steroid + immunosuppresants (95 % CI : 8.10-10.69, P< 0.001). Compared with azathiaprine alone (95 % CI: 4.49-10.11), cyclosporine (95 % CI: 8.27-12.66) + steroid achieved a significantly high survival rate (P = 0. 045). COX regression showed that regimes without immunosuppressants (RR = 2.73, P = 0.001), acute type of interstitial pneumonia (RR = 3.10, P = 0. 020), and lower pressure of oxygen (PO_2) at the beginning of treatment (RR = 6.17, P= 0. 005) were risk factors for CAMD-A/SIP. Conclusion The prognosis of CAMD-A/SIP is poor after treatment with existing regimes. Although the type of interstitial pneumonia is one of the decisive factors early intervention, combined regimes including steroid and immunosuppresants can also prolong the survival time, especially with the steroid cyclosporine regimes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?