Clinical value of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of gastric tumors
Chuan-Yu Wang,Xiao-Jing Fan,Fei-Liang Wang,Yue-Yue Ge,Zhao Cai,Wei Wang,Xin-Ping Zhou,Jun Du,De-Wei Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i1.110
2024-01-10
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Abstract:BACKGROUND The incidence of gastric cancer remains high, and it is the sixth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is a simple, non-invasive, and painless method for the diagnosis of gastric tumors. AIM To explore the diagnostic value of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection of gastric tumors. METHODS The screening results based on oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and electronic gastroscopy were compared with those of the postoperative pathological examination. RESULTS Among 42 patients with gastric tumors enrolled in the study, the diagnostic accordance rate was 95.2% for oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (n = 40) and 90.5% for electronic gastroscopy (n = 38) compared with postoperative pathological examination. The Kappa value of consistency test with pathological findings was 0.812 for oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and 0.718 for electronic gastroscopy, and there was no significant difference between them (P = 0.397). For the TNM staging of gastric tumors, the accuracy rate of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was 81.9% for the overall T staging and 50%, 77.8%, 100%, and 100% for T1, T2, T3, and T4 staging, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were both 100% for stages T3 and T4. The diagnostic accuracy rate of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was 93.8%, 80%, 100%, and 100% for stages N0, N1-N3, M0, and M1, respectively. CONCLUSION The accordance rate of qualitative diagnosis by oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is comparable to that of gastroscopy, and it could be used as the preferred method for the early screening of gastric tumors.
oncology,gastroenterology & hepatology