Rescuing Rational Expectations from Undeserved Ridicule
Oghenovo A. Obrimah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3493043
2019-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:It is no secret that the rational expectations framework has endured what many consider to be a well deserved bashing. From problems, such as, ad hoc specifications of functional forms for utility functions, to adoption of utility functions as units of modeling, to absence of equilibriums that support tattonement processes, weaknesses of the conventional approach to modeling of rational expectations equilibriums (REE) are many, varied, and of pragmatic importance. Perhaps the most telling criticism is the belief that, with REE premised on presence of economic agents that are perfect, it is impossible that economic agents are capable of rationality. Consider, however, that all of the weaknesses of REE that have been raised have nothing to do with desirability of the framework, rather have to do with implementation of the framework, that is, are man made, are created by economists and financial economists. In presence of this insight, it is not rational expectations theory that is deficient, rather it is the conventional implementation of the framework that is deficient. Using weaknesses of rational expectations modeling that are raised in Farmer and Geanakoplos (2009) as anchor, this study provides evidence for existence of a new, pragmatic, and well demonstrated approach to modeling of REE that facilitates a rescue of implementation of the concept from all of it's well deserved bashing. An important feature of the new and robust implementation is the fact that, for arrival at REE, there is not any demand for perfection from economic agents. If economic agents are sufficiently aware, REEs are arrived at instantaneously. If economic agents are lacking in some important awareness, REEs are arrived at in context of tattonement processes that are premised on learning on part of investors.