Mild Toxicity and Favorable Prognosis of High–Dose and Extended Involved-Field Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Patients with Early-Stage Nasal NK/T-Cell Lymphoma

Hua Wang,Ye-Xiong Li,Wei-Hu Wang,Jing Jin,Jian-Rong Dai,Shu-Lian Wang,Yue-Ping Liu,Yong-Wen Song,Zhao-Yang Wang,Qing-Feng Liu,Hui Fang,Shu-Nan Qi,Xin-Fan Liu,Zi-Hao Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.039
2012-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: The value of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma has not been previously reported. The aim of the present study was to assess the dosimetric parameters, toxicity, and treatment outcomes of patients with nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma.Methods and Materials: Between 2003 and 2008, 42 patients with early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma underwent definitive high-dose and extended involved-field IMRT with or without combination chemotherapy. The median radiation dose to the primary tumor was 50 Gy. The dose-volume histograms of the target volume and critical normal structures were evaluated in all patients. The locoregional control, overall survival, and progression-free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: The average mean dose delivered to the planning target volume was 55.5 Gy. Only 1.3% and 2.5% of the planning target volume received <90% and 95% of the prescribed dose, respectively, indicating excellent planning target volume coverage. The mean dose and average dose to the parotid glands was 15 Gy and 14 Gy, respectively. With a median follow-up time of 27 months, the 2-year locoregional control, overall survival, and progression-free survivalrate was 93%, 78%, and 74%, respectively. No Grade 4 or 5 acute or late toxicity was reported.Conclusions: High-dose and extended involved-field IMRT for patients with early-stage nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma showed favorable locoregional control, overall survival, and progression-free survival, with mild toxicity. The dose constraints of IMRT for the parotid glands can be limited to <20 Gy in these patients. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?