Abstract:OBJECTIVETo investigate the urodynamic features in patients of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with coexisting overactive bladder (OAB).METHODSClinical data of 235 patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent urodynamic examination during January 2009 to May 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into group of pure BPH, BPH with detrusor overactivity (DO), BPH with coexisting OAB without DO and BPH with coexisting OAB with DO. The difference of age, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-volume, maximum flow rate, residual urine volume, bladder volume of first sensation, bladder volume of strong sensation, bladder outlet obstruction index (BOOI) and the prevalence of decreased detrusor contractility were compared between these groups. The urodynamic characteristics of DO between group of BPH with DO and group of BPH coexisting OAB and DO were analyzed.RESULTSA total of 219 cases were included in the final analysis, with mean age of (66 ± 8) years, mean TRUS-volume was (35 ± 24) ml, mean maximum flow rate was (11 ± 6) ml/s. Of the 219 patients, 93 patients (42.5%) had pure BPH, 11 patients (5.0%) had BPH with DO, 52 patients (23.7%) had BPH coexisting OAB without DO, 63 patients (28.8%) had BPH coexisting OAB and DO. Comparing to group of BPH (n = 104), patients with BPH and OAB (n = 115) were older, had higher IPSS, bigger TRUS-volume, less bladder volume of first sensation and strong sensation, higher BOOI and higher prevalence of decreased detrusor contractility. Comparing to group of BPH with coexisting OAB without DO patients, patients of BPH with coexisting OAB and DO had higher IPSS score (19 ± 12 vs 17 ± 10), bigger TRUS-volume [(51 ± 33) ml vs (43 ± 27) ml], higher BOOI (49 ± 18 vs 37 ± 14). Comparing to patients pure BPH, patients of BPH with DO had less bladder volume of first sensation and bladder volume of strong sensation [(82 ± 41) ml vs (118 ± 35) ml;(335 ± 67) ml vs (419 ± 53) ml]. Comparing to group of BPH with DO, patients of BPH with coexisting OAB and DO had higher maximum DO pressure [(45 ± 36) cmH2O vs (39 ± 30) cmH2O (1 cmH2O = 0.098 kPa)] and longer DO time [(7 ± 4) s vs (6 ± 4) s].CONCLUSIONSThe urodynamic features in patients with BPH differ greatly and these information should be helpful in making choice of treatment and in predicting treatment outcomes.

The Clinical Analysis Of Urodynamic Test In Treating Bph Complicated With Neurogenic Disease

Urodynamic sanalysis of BPH with patients cerebrovascular accident

The Clinical Significance of Urodynamic Study of the Preoperative Diagnosis and Treatment about Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Postoperative Prevention of Bladder Spasm

Evaluation of detrusor function with urodynamics and treatment choice

Significance of urodynamics detection in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with cerebral vascular accident

[The Urodynamic Diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Coexisting Overactive Bladder].

Urodynamic Manifestation of Patients with Chronic Refractory Prostatitis and Its Therapeutic Guiding Value

Urodynamic Analysis of the Refractory Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

[Urodynamic Studies on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Combined with Diabetes Mellitus].

The urodynamics study in patient with chronic prostatitis(Report of 32 cases)

The value of pressure-flow study in diagnosis for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Applied value of urodynamic test for prevention and treatment of upper urinary damage in patients with bladder neck contracture：a retrospective study

The Impact of Detrusor Overactivity on Bladder Voiding Function in BPH Patients,Its Reason and Significance

Clinic signifance of urodynamic analysis in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with diabetes mellitus

Chronic Prostatitis with Non-Neurogenic Detrusor Sphincter Dyssynergia: Diagnosis and Treatment

Clinical significance of urodynamic studies in neurogenic bladder dysfunction caused by intervertebral disk hernia

Clinical Significance of Urodynamic Analysis in Patients With Benign Prostatic Enlargement Complicated With Diabetes Mellitus Editorial Comment

Clinical analysis of BPH and BPH with chronic prostatitis

The effect of bladder function on the efficacy of transurethral prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a retrospective, single-center study

Comparation of the Predictive Value Between Ultrasonography and Urodynamics for the Efficacy of Transurethral Resection of Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

The Significance of Urodynamic Examination for Patients with Benign Pro-static Hyperplasia and Diabetes