A Critical Review of Neil Postman's Idea of Social "Aestheticization"
JIN Huimin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16430/j.cnki.fl.2010.06.001
2010-01-01
Abstract:"Aestheticization" has been increasingly employed by Western sociologists as a perspective to look at the process of modernization,and Chinese critics are interested in the more specific "Aestheticization of Everyday Life".The researches on "Aestheticization" are plentiful and fruitful in both China and the West. However,there is hardly any serious attention paid to Neil Postman's thought on "Image-Entertainization". In this paper Postman's "Image-Entertainization" is regarded as basically the same as the "Image-Aestheticization" developed by Baudrillard and his likes,but,having its own system,it involves at least three other aspects.First,image is associated with sense,and therefore with the aesthetic and the sensory entertainization;second,image pretends to be the thing itself;it is produced in order not to signifybut substitute the thing itself.Third,image is purely appearance;it plays only at the level of appearance,and does not care what to be represented,but how to adapt its representation to the needs of vision,form and therefore the sense.To be brief,the consequence of image-production is entertainization,aestheticization,or in a combined form of the two,aesthetic-entertainization,in which all the truth is moved away without notice.