Concurrent Chemotherapy Can Further Improve Clinical Outcome For Stage Iii Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Imrt In Endemic Area
W. Xiao,C. Zhao,F. Han,L. Lu,S. Wu,X. Deng,T. Lu,N. Cui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1492
2009-01-01
Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)To investigate the effect of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the stage III NPC patients.Materials/MethodsBetween May 2001 and November 2006, 184 Chinese patients were treated with IMRT for stage III NPC in the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University. Sixty two patients received IMRT alone (IMRT-alone group) while other 122 patients received at least two cycles of CCT (IMRT + CCT group). Disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) are compared between the two groups. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze the prognostic factors including age, gender, T, N, gross tumor volume of the nasopharynx (GTVnx) and chemotherapy.ResultsMedian follow-up were 36 and 32 months for IMRT-alone group and IMRT + CCT group respectively. The 3-year estimates of DSS, LRFS, RRFS and DMFS were 85%, 92%, 94%, and 83% for the IMRT-alone group, respectively, compared with 95% (p = 0.01), 99% (p = 0.04), 97% (p = 0.41), and 85% (p = 0.73) for the IMRT + CCT group, respectively. The Cox regression showed that the hazard rates ratio of IMRT + CCT to IMRT-alone was 0.216, 0.092, 0.446, and 0.715 for DSS (p = 0.012), LRFS (p = 0.042), RRFS (p = 0.331), and DMFS (p = 0.860), respectively.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that CCT in Chinese patients with stage III NPC can improve DSS when patients are treated with IMRT and the survival benefit seems to be associated with a significant improved LRFS. Purpose/Objective(s)To investigate the effect of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the stage III NPC patients. To investigate the effect of concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for the stage III NPC patients. Materials/MethodsBetween May 2001 and November 2006, 184 Chinese patients were treated with IMRT for stage III NPC in the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University. Sixty two patients received IMRT alone (IMRT-alone group) while other 122 patients received at least two cycles of CCT (IMRT + CCT group). Disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) are compared between the two groups. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze the prognostic factors including age, gender, T, N, gross tumor volume of the nasopharynx (GTVnx) and chemotherapy. Between May 2001 and November 2006, 184 Chinese patients were treated with IMRT for stage III NPC in the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University. Sixty two patients received IMRT alone (IMRT-alone group) while other 122 patients received at least two cycles of CCT (IMRT + CCT group). Disease specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) are compared between the two groups. Cox proportional-hazards model was used to analyze the prognostic factors including age, gender, T, N, gross tumor volume of the nasopharynx (GTVnx) and chemotherapy. ResultsMedian follow-up were 36 and 32 months for IMRT-alone group and IMRT + CCT group respectively. The 3-year estimates of DSS, LRFS, RRFS and DMFS were 85%, 92%, 94%, and 83% for the IMRT-alone group, respectively, compared with 95% (p = 0.01), 99% (p = 0.04), 97% (p = 0.41), and 85% (p = 0.73) for the IMRT + CCT group, respectively. The Cox regression showed that the hazard rates ratio of IMRT + CCT to IMRT-alone was 0.216, 0.092, 0.446, and 0.715 for DSS (p = 0.012), LRFS (p = 0.042), RRFS (p = 0.331), and DMFS (p = 0.860), respectively. Median follow-up were 36 and 32 months for IMRT-alone group and IMRT + CCT group respectively. The 3-year estimates of DSS, LRFS, RRFS and DMFS were 85%, 92%, 94%, and 83% for the IMRT-alone group, respectively, compared with 95% (p = 0.01), 99% (p = 0.04), 97% (p = 0.41), and 85% (p = 0.73) for the IMRT + CCT group, respectively. The Cox regression showed that the hazard rates ratio of IMRT + CCT to IMRT-alone was 0.216, 0.092, 0.446, and 0.715 for DSS (p = 0.012), LRFS (p = 0.042), RRFS (p = 0.331), and DMFS (p = 0.860), respectively. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that CCT in Chinese patients with stage III NPC can improve DSS when patients are treated with IMRT and the survival benefit seems to be associated with a significant improved LRFS. Our findings suggest that CCT in Chinese patients with stage III NPC can improve DSS when patients are treated with IMRT and the survival benefit seems to be associated with a significant improved LRFS.