AFLP analysis of genetic relationship in peach of wild and local varieties germplasm resources

WANG Fu-rong,TONG Zhao-guo,ZHAO Jian-bo,ZHANG Zhen,JIANG Quan,GUO Ji-ying,CHEN Qing-hua,ZHANG Kai-chun,JIANG Li-jie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2008.03.004
2008-01-01
Abstract:Ninety four wild peach genotypes were analyzed by AFLP markers. 9 primer pairs were selected from 64 primer pairs (E+2/M+3) to amplify the genomic DNA. Total of 236 AFLP bands were obtained, 141(29.5%) of them were polymorphic markers. UPGMA clustering result showed: when genetic distance was 0.326 7, Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, P. davidiana var. potaninii Rehd. and P. mira Koehne could be clustered into one group. P. persica ssp. ferganensis Kost. et Riab. was close to this group, and then the P. kansuensis Rehd., P. davidiana (Carr.) Franch. was thirdly close to this group. When genetic distance was 0.217 8, Wuyuexianbian, Bainianhu and Hunchuntao were clustered into one group separately. When genetic distance was 0.199 7, P. Persica (L.) Bastch was clearly divided into 4 groups: Group I were comprised of southern and northwestern local varieties (include mostly southern flat peach); Group II had only nectarine (Gansujiuquan) ; Group III were consisted of wildness and northern local varieties, most northern hard-melting peach were clustered in this group; Group IV were comprised of 2 ornamental peaches, Baibitao and Baihuashanbitao.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?