Efficacy of Movement Imagination on Rehabilitation of Hand Function in Patients with Post-Stroke Hemiplegia

朱琳,贾晓红,刘霖,王世云,杨胜荣,宋为群

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2009.09.002

2009-01-01

Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of movement imagination training (mirror therapy) on distal upper-extremity motor function, spastieity, and hand function reeovery in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Methods Thirty-five patients with post-stroke hemiplegia within 12 months were divided into mirror therapy group (n=20) and control group (n=15) according to their odd and even numbers on admission. All patients received traditional physical therapy and occupational therapy 5 days a week, 2 to 5 hours a day. The patients of mirror therapy group were received ancillary mirror therapy once for 30 minutes, twice a day; the patients of control group were trained without ancillary mirror therapy (avoidiag visual training completely) once for 30 minutes, twice a day. The training Ihne was 4 weeks for both groups. The Brunnstrom stage of motor recovery, modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and hand motor function (self-care seores in the functional independence measure [FIM]) were assessed at 4 weeks before and after the treatment. Both groups were followed up at 4 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months after the treatment, and the changes of Brunnstrom, MAS, and FIM were evaluated. Two patients who continued to do self-rehahilitatian program for 3 months after diseharge were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and surface electromyography. Results ①Four weeks after the treatment, the Brunnstrom and FIM scores in the mirror therapy group were increased 0.6±0.5 and 3.8±1.9, respectively; those in the control group were increased 0.1± 0.6 and 1.5±2.6, respectively. There were significant differences between the added values of Brunnstrom and FIM in the twa groups. Comparing the added values of Brunnstrom in hoth groups were t= 2.69, P 0.05, and comparing the added values of FIM in both groups were t =3.03, P0.01. However, the spasticity scares an MAS in the mirror therapy and cantral groups decreased 0.2±0.4 and 0.1±0.3, respectively. After the treatment, the MAS score in the mirror therapy group was lower than that before treatment (P 0.05), which indicated the spaslieity was improved in this group. ②Brunnstram and FIM scares in the mirror group were higher than those in the control group after 1, 3, and 6 months (P0.05 all). ③Surface electromyography showed that the time-varying muscle activity of the extensor carpi radialis muscle was more obvious than that af the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle when the movement of wrist dorsal extension was perfarmed. ④Brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) showed that there were high-intensity signals at the right primry matar area and supplementary motor area, and at the left primary motor area in the mirror group. Conclusion The effieacy of movement imagination training is significant for improving hand function and reducing hand disahility in patients with post-strake hemiplegia, however, its effect af relieving spasticity is not obviaus.