Abstract:Genetic engineering is one of the most advanced technologies in the world and can bring vast profits to developers by patenting resultant achievements. But genetic engineering must be based on original genetic materials. For obtaining such materials, developers travel around the world, especially to genetically rich areas in developing countries, to prospect for valuable genetic resources and bring back for research and patent derivate products. However a lot of disputes have arisen from such patents, such as the Enola patent dispute on Mexican traditional crop mayocoba bean and the patent dispute on sacred plant Ayahuasca between people and one U.S. Company. Indigenous people, who live in the origin areas of genetic resources for a long history, have established traditional and cultural genuine relation with some living species. These disputes revealed that some genetic engineering exploitation and patents based on certain species may be severely offensive against indigenous peoples spiritual, religious, or cultural traditions. Although genetic engineering achievements patentability has been argued for a long time, the TRIPs Agreement requirement and the worlds legislation trend, either in developed countries such as the U.S., European Union or in developing countries such as China, have indicated that genetic engineering products and processes are legitimately patentable. But some loophole exists in the patent acquisition procedure of current legislation, which allows such offensive patents to be granted. To prevent such offensive patents, one prior consents solution is proposed in this article, which requires genetic engineering developers to obtain prior consents from origin countries of genetic resources before they exploit these resources and patent derivate achievements. This solution is based on the Convention on Biological Diversity, which affirmed countrys sovereignty over their genetic resources and allowed countries to regulate and manage genetic resources in their territory. The Convention on Biological Diversity does not conflict with IPR legislation, in particular the TRIPs Agreement and the obligations under both treaties should be respected. The implementation of this proposed solution is based on the establishment of national genetic resources authority, which generally manages its countrys genetic resources and works as indigenous peoples representative with the authorization of state government. This solution should be implemented in three levels: domestically, transnationally and globally. Therefore, offensive genetic engineering patents could be prevented both by such authoritys examination and granting prior consents before developers access to genetic resources and by national patent administrations examination on prior consents proof from origin countrys authority before granting patents.

Protection upon Intellectual Property of Aborigines' Traditional Resources

Intellectual Property Tools in Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Chinese Perspective

Prior Consents: Preventing Offensive Genetic Engineering Patents Against Indigenous People's Rights

A New Exploration of Knowledge Intellectual Property Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage

Exploration of Legal Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Intangible Cultural Heritage

WIPO initiative of transforming traditional resources and sharing rights: An evolutionary game analysis and a Chinese context

Civil Right Socialization for the Legislation Value Tropism of Intellectual Property

Intellectual property protection for traditional medical knowledge in China’s context: a round peg in a square hole?

The International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and the Challenges China is Confronted With

Countermeasure Analysts on Conflicts Between the Protection of Genetic Resources Diversity and Intellectual Property on Biological Technique

The Legal Protection Path of Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ethnic Minorities Beyond the Framework of Intellectual Property Rights

On the intellectual property right protection of mongolian medicine

Foreign Practices and Elicitation for Protection of Indigenous Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge

Integrating China's Intellectual Property Policies and Development Strategies

Analysis of Injury to Agriculture of Unfair Intellectual Property Protection towards Farm Produce in China

Rights–Values–Interests: The Conflict between World Cultural Heritage and Community: A Case Study of the West Lake Cultural Landscape Heritage in China

Research on Intellectual Property Right Protection of Genetic Resources in China Under Benefit-Sharing

The Limits to Law: How Intellectual Properties Are Used and Protected in Chinese Industries

The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: the Core Strategy for Global Development of Traditional Chinese Medical Industry in the 21st Century

Research on the Path to Breakthrough in the Dilemma of Chinese Traditional Medicine Intellectual Property Protection

On Protection and Benefit-sharing of Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge in the Ethnic Areas of China