Abstract:Temporal modulation sensitivity has been studied extensively for Cochlear Implant (CI) users due to its strong correlation to speech recognition outcomes. Previous studies reported that temporal modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) vary across the tonotopic axis and attributed this variation to patchy neural survival. However, correlates of neural health identified in animal models depend on electrode position in humans. Nonetheless, the relationship between MDT and electrode location has not been explored. We tested 13 ears for the effect of distance on modulation sensitivity, specifically targeting the question of whether electrodes closer to the modiolus are universally beneficial. Participants in this study were postlingually deafened and users of Cochlear Nucleus CIs. The distance of each electrode from the medial wall (MW) of the cochlea and mid-modiolar axis (MMA) was measured from scans obtained using computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The distance measures were correlated with slopes of spatial tuning curves measured on selected electrodes to investigate if electrode position accounts, at least in part, for the width of neural excitation. In accordance with previous findings, electrode position explained 24% of the variance in slopes of the spatial tuning curves. All functioning electrodes were also measured for MDTs. Five ears showed a positive correlation between MDTs and at least one distance measure across the array; 6 ears showed negative correlations and the remaining two ears showed no relationship. The ears showing positive MDT-distance correlations, thus benefiting from electrodes being close to the neural elements, were those who performed better on the two speech recognition measures, i.e., speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and recognition of the AzBio sentences. These results could suggest that ears able to take advantage of the proximal placement of electrodes are likely to have better speech recognition outcomes. Previous histological studies of humans demonstrated that speech recognition is correlated with spiral ganglion cell counts. Alternatively, ears with good speech recognition outcomes may have good overall neural health, which is a precondition for close electrodes to produce spatially confined neural excitation patterns that facilitate modulation sensitivity. These findings suggest that the methods to reduce channel interaction, e.g., perimodiolar electrode array or current focusing, may only be beneficial for a subgroup of CI users. Additionally, it suggests that estimating neural survival preoperatively is important for choosing the most appropriate electrode array type (perimodiolar vs. lateral wall) for optimal implant function.

[Compare NRT Value of Straight Electrode and Contour Electrode in Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System].

The Intraoperative Application of Neural Response Telemetry with the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant

Relationship between neural response telemetry threshold and T-level behavior in patients with cochlear implants

[The value of threshold of neural response telemetry on the prediction of behavioral audiometry threshold after cochlear implantation patients].

Instructions of Neural Response Telemetry for Prediction of the Rehabilitation Effects and Mapping in Children Cochlear Implant

[Electrically Evoked Auditory Nerve Compound Action Potentials in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users].

[Observation on the Change of Electrode Impedance and THR/MCL Values in 20 Cases with Med-EL Combi 40+ Cochlear Implant].

Electrically Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Using Extracochlear Stimulation at Different Cochlear Sites: A Comparison With Intracochlear Stimulation

Objective and Subjective Evaluations of the Nurotron Venus Cochlear Implant System Via Animal Experiments and Clinical Trials

Impedance of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Scalae Tympani

Electrophysiological characteristics of EABR and its value assessment of cochlear implant]

Development and Evaluation of the Nurotron 26-Electrode Cochlear Implant System

Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation

The Application Value of H-reflex Induced by Electrical Stimulation of the Sacral Nerve at the S3 Foramen in Stimulus Parameter Programming

Effect of Surgical Technique on Electrode Impedance after Cochlear Implantation

Is the spread of excitation different between adults and children cochlear implants users?

Relationship between electrode position and temporal modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users: are close electrodes always better?

Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition

Comparable Electrode Impedance and Speech Perception at 12 Months after Cochlear Implantation Using Round Window Versus Cochleostomy: an Analysis of 40 Patients

A Report of Nurotron Cochlear Implant Clinical Trial

Auditory Evoked Responses in the Rat: Transverse Mastoid Needle Electrodes Register Before Cochlear Nucleus and Do Not Reflect Later Inferior Colliculus Activity.