Abstract:Two kinds of Three-dimensional Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship (3D-QSAR) methods, comparative molecular field analysis (CoNWA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA), were applied to analyze the structure-activity relationship of a series of 63 butenolkle ETA selective antagonists with respect to thew inhibition against human ETA receptor. The CoNWA and CoMSIA models were developed for the conceivable alignment of the molecules based on a template structure from the crystallized data. The statistical results from the initial orientation of the aligned molecules show that the 3D-QSAR model from CoNWA ( q(2) = 0.543) is Obviously Superior to that from the Conventional CoMSIA (q(2) = 0.407). In order to refine the model, all-space search (ASS) was applied to minimize the field sampling process. By rotating and translating the molecular aggregate within the grid systematically, all the possible samplings of the molecular fields were tested and subsequently the one with the highest q(2) was picked out. The comparison of the sensitivity of CoMFA and CoMSIA to different space orientation shows that the CoMFA q(2) Values are more sensitive to the translations and rotations of the aligned molecules with respect to the lattice than those of CoMSIA. The best CoMFA model from ASS was further refined by the region focused technique. The high quality of the best model is indicated by the high cross-validated correlation and the prediction on the external test set. The CoMFA coefficient contour plots identify several key features dud explain the wide range of activities, which may help us to design new effective ETA selective antagonists.

A Comparative Study of Quantitative Structure–activity Relationship Methods Based on Gallic Acid Derivatives

CoMFA, CoMSIA and HQSAR studies of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

Three-Dimension Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analysis of Some Cinnamamides Using Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis (CoMSIA)

Three-dimensional Quantitative Structure–activity Relationship Analyses of a Series of Cinnamamides

Three-dimensional quantitative structure–activity relationship study for analogues of TQXs using CoMFA and CoMSIA

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship of 2-Alkyl-4-(biphenylylmethoxy) Pyridine Derivatives with AT1 Receptor Antagonistic Activity

Studies on the Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships of Paclitaxel Analogues

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure−Activity Relationship Analysis of the New Potent Sulfonylureas Using Comparative Molecular Similarity Indices Analysis

QSAR of Macrolactone Derivatives with Herbicidal Activity

3D-QSAR Study of AHMA Derivatives as Potent Anticancer Agents

Molecular hologram QSAR study of 3-pyridyl ether analogues

Predictive QSAR Models of 3-Acylamino-2-aminopropionic Acid Derivatives As Partial Agonists of the Glycine Site on the NMDA Receptor

Three-Dimensional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Analyses of A Series of Butenolide Eta Antagonists

Studies of H4R Antagonists Using 3D-QSAR, Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics

Study on the Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of 10-Oac -Paclitaxel Analogues

Applications of genetic algorithms on the structure-activity relationship analysis of some cinnamamides.

Hqsar and Topomer Comfa for Predicting Melanocortin-4 Receptor Binding Affinities of Trans-4-(4-Chlorophenyl) Pyrrolidine-3-Carboxamides

HQSAR study for two datasets separated on CDMPC chiral stationary phases.

Study of Chiral Separation for 5-Arylhydantoins Based on CoMFA and HQSAR Models

Comparative Study of Qsar/Qspr Correlations Using Support Vector Machines, Radial Basis Function Neural Networks, and Multiple Linear Regression

Studies on Three-Dimensional Qsar of Muscarinic Receptor Agonists