Presumptive Correctness of Real Estate Register
Cheng Xiao
2010-01-01
Abstract:The first sentence of § 16 of CPL (Chinese Property Law) stipulates the presumptive correctness of real estate register,but not merely endows the register with the qualification of evidence. Firstly,if we would not acknowledge this sentence stipulates the presumption of register, the acquisition of real estate in good faith,which is regulated by § 106 of CPL,would lose its foundation.Secondly,the point of view that thinks this sentence just endows the register with evidence qualification contradicts § 17 and the first sentence of § 19 of CPL.Lastly,this sentence stipulates that the register shall be the basis for deciding the rights and their contents on a real estate, but the first sentence of § 17 of CPL just regulates that the certificate of rights shall be the evidence of real estate property.The difference means that the lawmaker of CPL acknowledges the presumption of register. The presumption of register,which makes the real estate property more clear,lays the foun- dation for the system of acquisition of real estate in good faith.And it is also of great help to effectively maintain the security of transaction as well as improve the efficiency of business.The presumption of register constitutes the presumption of rights as a kind of legal presumption,and it can be rebutted by opposite evidences.The presumption of register can be classified into positive presumption and negative presumption.It can be applied to the rights with registrability, such as right to use construction land,right to the contracted management of land,right to mineral locating,mining right,right to use water,right to use ocean areas,easement of land and mortgage of real estate,and so on.Furthermore,the priority notice can also be presumed to be correct within some limits.However,the presumption of register can not be applied to obligatory right,legal status,legal capacity,etc.,even if they are registered. The first sentence of § 16 of CPL is not a substantive rule,but a procedural rule about the burden of proof.In other words,it can not determine the real holders of rights on a real estate finally. When somebody raises an objection to the correctness of the real register,the presumption of register can be rebutted by opposite evidences.And the rules in the substantive laws,such as § 17 Ⅰ of Chinese Marriage Law,can also negate the presumptive correctness of the register.